Increase in antioxidant enzyme activity, stress tolerance and biocontrol efficacy of Pichia kudriavzevii with the transition from a yeast-like to biofilm morphology
Abstract
Morphological change, such as from yeast-like to biofilm, has been recently considered to be involved in the mode of action of some antagonistic yeasts used as postharvest biocontrol agents. In the present study, the biocontrol yeast, Pichia kudriavzevii, reversibly shifted from a yeast-like morphology on yeast peptone dextrose (YPD) medium with 2% agar to a biofilm morphology on YPD with 0.3% agar. The tolerance of P. kudriavzevii to heat and oxidative stresses, as well as the biocontrol efficacy against postharvest diseases on pear fruit, increased significantly from the yeast-like form to the biofilm form. The activity of antioxidant enzymes, including catalase and superoxidase dismutase, in the biofilm form was also significantly higher. The elevated activity of antioxidant enzymes was associated with less protein and lipid oxidation in the biofilm form, compared to the yeast-like form, under heat and oxidative stresses. These results suggest that activation of antioxidant system with the morphology shift contributes to the enhancement of abiotic stress tolerance and biocontrol performance of P. kudriavzevii. These findings provide new information on the biology of yeast antagonists that is essential for their potential application and development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biofilm formation has been implicated in the protective and biocontrol activities of A. pullulans, Kloeckera apiculata, S. cerevisiae, Pichia kudriavzevii, W. anomalus, and M. pulcherrima.
“Besides P. fermentans, biofilm formation has also been implicated in the protective and biocontrol activities of A. pullulans, Kloeckera apiculata, S. cerevisiae, Pichia kudriavzevii, W. anomalus, and M. pulcherrima (Supplementary Table 1) (Chi et al. 2015; Klein and Kupper 2018; Ortu et al. 2005; Pu et al. 2014; Wachowska et al. 2016).”
From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Chi et al. 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Chi, M., Li, G., Liu, Y., Liu, G., Li, M., Zhang, X., Sun, Z., Sui, Y., & Liu, J.
- Affiliations
- Hefei University of Technology (CN)
- Anhui Agricultural University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Yongsheng
- Liu, Guoqing
- Sui, Yuan
- Liu, Jia
- Venue
- Biological Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 90
- Pages
- 113-119
- ISSN
- 1049-9644 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W927082660
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Control (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401794)
- Public Service Platform in Anhui Wanjiang Institute of Poultry Technology (1401032006)
- Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1408085MC68)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
- Keywords
- Candida krusei, yeast biofilms, morphological transition, postharvest biocontrol, pear fruit, postharvest disease, antioxidant enzymes, catalase, superoxide dismutase, oxidative stress resistance, heat tolerance, protein oxidation, lipid oxidation, antagonistic yeasts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review