CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bioeconomy national strategies in the G20 and OECD countries: Sharing experiences and comparing existing policies

Gardossi, Lucia, Philp, Jim, Fava, Fabio, Winickoff, David, D'Aprile, Laura, Dell'Anno, Benedetta, Marvik, Ole Jørgen, Lenzi, Andrea·2023·EFB Bioeconomy Journal
DOI 10.1016/j.bioeco.2023.100053
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This manuscript addresses the existing governance tools and monitoring systems for implementing a sustainable and regenerative Bioeconomy in the OECD member states and G20. It takes inspiration from the outcomes of an international workshop entitled Bioeconomy in the G20 and OECD countries: sharing and comparing the existing national strategies and policies for co-designing more effective bioeconomy governance mechanisms and monitoring systems co-organized by the Italian Presidency of G20 environment 2021, the National Bioeconomy Coordination Board of the National Committee of Biosafety, Biotechnology and Life Sciences of the Italian Presidency of Council of Ministers and the OECD Working Party on Bio-, Nano- and Converging Technologies. The workshop aimed to share virtuous experiences, identify challenges and co-design more robust governance tools and more comprehensive monitoring systems. The manuscript outlines the current situation regarding governance and monitoring, so as to identify relevant issues and areas for further research and policy action.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bioeco.2023.100053

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Aggestam, 2022, Implementing circular-bioeconomy. Principles across two value chains of the wood-based sector: a conceptual approach, Land, 11, 2037, 10.3390/land11112037 · DOI
  2. Alviar, 2021, Measuring the contribution of the bioeconomy: the case of Colombia and Antioquia, Sustainability, 13, 2353, 10.3390/su13042353 · DOI
  3. Anon, Cambridge Econometrics, https://edepot.wur.nl/356161 (Accessed 29 November 2022).
  4. Anon https://cnbbsv.palazzochigi.it/en/bioeconomy/bioeconomy-events/g20-oecd-workshop-bioeconomy-in-the-g20-and-oecd-countries/(Accessed 29 November 2022).
  5. Arru, 2022, The circular economy in the agri-food system: a performance measurement of European Countries, Economia Agro-Alimentare/Food Econ., 24
  6. Bell, 2021, Addressing the post-COVID era through engineering biology, Eng. Biol., 5, 21, 10.1049/enb2.12008 · DOI
  7. Böhringer, 2007, Measuring the immeasurable - a survey of sustainability indices, Ecol. Econ., 63, 1, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bracco, 2018, Assessing the contribution of bioeconomy to the total economy: a review of national frameworks, Sustainability, 10, 1698, 10.3390/su10061698 · DOI
  9. Bruckner, 2015, Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: a review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods, Ecol. Econ., 114, 11, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.008 · DOI
  10. Bugge, 2016, What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature, Sustainability, 8, 691, 10.3390/su8070691 · DOI
  11. Carlson, 2016, Estimating the biotech sector's contribution to the US economy, Nat. Biotechnol., 34, 247, 10.1038/nbt.3491 · DOI
  12. Carus, 2020, Renewable carbon: key to a sustainable and future-oriented chemical and plastic industry: definition, strategy, measures and potential, Greenh. Gases, 10, 488, 10.1002/ghg.1992 · DOI
  13. Chen, 2023, Direct air capture (DAC) and sequestration of CO2: dramatic effect of coordinated Cu(II) onto a chelating weak base ion exchanger, Sci. Adv., 9
  14. Deivanayagam, 2023, Breaking free from tunnel vision for climate change and health, PLOS Glob. Public Health, 3, 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001684 · DOI
  15. Egenolf, 2019, Conceptualization of an indicator system for assessing the sustainability of the bioeconomy, Sustainability, 11, 443, 10.3390/su11020443 · DOI
  16. El-Chichakli, 2016, Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy, Nature, 535, 221, 10.1038/535221a · DOI
  17. Eriksen, 2023, A growing plastic smog, now estimated to be over 170 trillion plastic particles afloat in the world's oceans—urgent solutions required, PLoS One, 18, 10.1371/journal.pone.0281596 · DOI
  18. 2021, Office of management and budget, North American industry classification system—Revision for 2022, Fed. Regist., 86, 72277
  19. Frisvold, 2021, Understanding the U.S. bioeconomy: a new definition and landscape, Sustainability, 13, 1627, 10.3390/su13041627 · DOI
  20. Hernandez, 2019, Exergy: a universal metric for measuring resource efficiency to address industrial decarbonization, Sustain. Prod. Consump., 20, 151, 10.1016/j.spc.2019.05.006 · DOI
  21. Huang, 2021, Greenhouse gas emission mitigation potential of chemicals produced from biomass, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 9, 14480, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04836 · DOI
  22. Kircher, 2022, Economic trends in the transition into a circular bioeconomy, J. Risk Financ. Manag., 15, 44, 10.3390/jrfm15020044 · DOI
  23. Lange, 2021, Developing a sustainable and circular bio-based economy in EU: by partnering across sectors, upscaling and using new knowledge faster, and for the benefit of climate, environment & biodiversity, and people & business, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8, 10.3389/fbioe.2020.619066 · DOI
  24. Lier, 2018, Synthesis on bioeconomy monitoring systems in the EU Member States - indicators for monitoring the progress of bioeconomy, Natur. Resour. Bioecon. Stud.
  25. Marvik, 2020, The systemic challenge of the bioeconomy: a policy framework for transitioning towards a sustainable carbon cycle economy, EMBO Rep., 21, e51478, 10.15252/embr.202051478 · DOI
  26. Meyfroidt, 2022, Ten facts about land systems for sustainability, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 119, 10.1073/pnas.2109217118 · DOI
  27. Ronzon, 2020, Developments of economic growth and employment in bioeconomy sectors across the EU, Sustainability, 12, 4507, 10.3390/su12114507 · DOI
  28. Shawki, 2016, Norms and normative change in world politics: an analysis of land rights and the Sustainable Development Goals, Global Change, Peace & Security, 28, 249, 10.1080/14781158.2016.1196659 · DOI
  29. Stark, 2022, Sustainability implications of transformation pathways for the bioeconomy, Sustain. Prod. Consumpt., 29, 215, 10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.011 · DOI
  30. Stegmann, 2020, The circular bioeconomy: its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 6
  31. van Dam, 2011, Striving to further harmonization of sustainability criteria for bioenergy in Europe: recommendations from a stakeholder questionnaire, Energy Policy, 39, 4051, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.022 · DOI
  32. Velasco-Mu˜noz, 2021, Circular economy implementation in the agricultural sector: definition, strategies and indicators, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 170

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gardossi, L., Philp, J., Fava, F., Winickoff, D., D'Aprile, L., Dell'Anno, B., Marvik, O. J., & Lenzi, A.
ORCID
Gardossi, Lucia
Venue
EFB Bioeconomy Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
3
Pages
100053
ISSN
2667-0410
DOI
10.1016/j.bioeco.2023.100053
Cited by
43
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review