The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material
Abstract
Biologic scaffolds composed of naturally occurring extracellular matrix (ECM) have received significant attention for their potential therapeutic applications. The full potential of the ability of ECM scaffolds to promote constructive remodeling will not be realized, however, until an understanding of the biology and the external influences that affect biology, are better achieved. The factors that appear important for the constructive remodeling of ECM biologic scaffolds are its ability to be rapidly and completely degraded with the generation of downstream bioactive molecules, the bioinductive properties of the functional molecules that compose native ECM material and the ability to engineer its mechanical properties at the time of implantation through an understanding of its collagen fiber microstructure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biologically derived scaffold materials prepared by decellularization methods that preserve native structure and composition can promote constructive tissue remodeling in various tissues and organs.
“A number of studies have shown that biologically derived scaffold materials, when prepared by tissue decellularization methods that largely preserve native structure and composition, are capable of promoting constructive tissue remodeling in a number of tissues and organs [153].”
From Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine (2012) · cites this paper as [153]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 79 · Cited by 1,022
- Authors
- Badylak, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- ORCID
- Badylak, Stephen F.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 3587-3593
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002230244
- Cited by
- 1,022
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 67
- FWCI
- 44.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Keywords
- extracellular matrix, biological scaffolds, tissue engineering, scaffold degradation, bioactive compounds, mechanical properties, implantation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Collagen, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Tissue Engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review