Cited by 160Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Feeder-free self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells in 3D porous natural polymer scaffolds

Li, Zhensheng, Leung, Matthew, Hopper, Richard, Ellenbogen, Richard, Zhang, Miqin·2010·Biomaterials

Abstract

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are routinely cultured on fibroblast feeder layers or in fibroblast-conditioned medium, which requires continued supply of feeder cells and poses the risks of xenogenic contamination and other complications such as feeder-dependent outcome. Here, we demonstrate a strategy that supports sustained self-renewal of hESCs in a three-dimensional porous natural polymer scaffold, comprised of chitosan and alginate, without the support of feeder cells or conditioned medium. We assessed the pluripotency of the renewed hESCs both in vitro by evaluation of cellular proliferation, functionality, and gene activities for 21 days, and in vivo by implantation of the stem cell populated scaffolds in an immunodeficient mouse model to induce teratoma formation. The self-renewed stem cells can be easily recovered for subculture by decomposing the scaffold under a mild condition. We further subcultured recovered hESCs for 14 days and verified their pluripotency. In addition to providing a clean environment for stem cell renewal, this strategy, with the demonstrated biocompatibility and biodegradability of chitosan and alginate, may potentially allow for the direct implantation of stem cell populated scaffolds for a broad spectrum of applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.070

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CA scaffolds have noticeably higher mechanical strength than their equivalents due to the ionic interaction of the amine group of chitosan with the carboxyl group of alginates.

    “When compared to their equivalents, CA scaffolds have a noticeably higher mechanical strength due to the ionic interaction of the amine group of chitosan with the carboxyl group of alginates [47].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z., Leung, M., Hopper, R., Ellenbogen, R., & Zhang, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Miqin
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
404-412
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088319207
Cited by
160
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
human embryonic stem cells, feeder-free culture, self-renewal, 3D porous scaffolds, chitosan, alginate, pluripotency, teratoma formation, scaffold degradation, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine
MeSH terms
Alginates, Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Cells, Cultured, Hexuronic Acids, Humans, Materials Testing, Mice, Nude, Tensile Strength, Teratoma, Biomarkers, Porosity, Mice, SCID, Culture Media, Conditioned, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Lineage, Compressive Strength, Implants, Experimental, Glucuronic Acid, Tissue Engineering, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Chitosan, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review