Feeder-free self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells in 3D porous natural polymer scaffolds
Abstract
Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are routinely cultured on fibroblast feeder layers or in fibroblast-conditioned medium, which requires continued supply of feeder cells and poses the risks of xenogenic contamination and other complications such as feeder-dependent outcome. Here, we demonstrate a strategy that supports sustained self-renewal of hESCs in a three-dimensional porous natural polymer scaffold, comprised of chitosan and alginate, without the support of feeder cells or conditioned medium. We assessed the pluripotency of the renewed hESCs both in vitro by evaluation of cellular proliferation, functionality, and gene activities for 21 days, and in vivo by implantation of the stem cell populated scaffolds in an immunodeficient mouse model to induce teratoma formation. The self-renewed stem cells can be easily recovered for subculture by decomposing the scaffold under a mild condition. We further subcultured recovered hESCs for 14 days and verified their pluripotency. In addition to providing a clean environment for stem cell renewal, this strategy, with the demonstrated biocompatibility and biodegradability of chitosan and alginate, may potentially allow for the direct implantation of stem cell populated scaffolds for a broad spectrum of applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CA scaffolds have noticeably higher mechanical strength than their equivalents due to the ionic interaction of the amine group of chitosan with the carboxyl group of alginates.
“When compared to their equivalents, CA scaffolds have a noticeably higher mechanical strength due to the ionic interaction of the amine group of chitosan with the carboxyl group of alginates [47].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Cites
Feeder-independent culture of human embryonic stem cells
Ludwig, T. E., Bergendahl, V., Levenstein, M. E., Yu, J., Probasco, M. D., & Thomson, J. A. (2006) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth902 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chitosan–alginate 3D scaffolds as a mimic of the glioma tumor microenvironment
Kievit, F. M., Florczyk, S. J., Leung, M. C., Veiseh, O., Park, J. O., Disis, M. L., & Zhang, M. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.062 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Self-citationResorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, Z., Leung, M., Hopper, R., Ellenbogen, R., & Zhang, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Miqin
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 404-412
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088319207
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Keywords
- human embryonic stem cells, feeder-free culture, self-renewal, 3D porous scaffolds, chitosan, alginate, pluripotency, teratoma formation, scaffold degradation, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine
- MeSH terms
- Alginates, Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Cells, Cultured, Hexuronic Acids, Humans, Materials Testing, Mice, Nude, Tensile Strength, Teratoma, Biomarkers, Porosity, Mice, SCID, Culture Media, Conditioned, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Lineage, Compressive Strength, Implants, Experimental, Glucuronic Acid, Tissue Engineering, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Chitosan, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review