Cited by 117Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsBone Tissue Engineering Materials

Chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells induced by acellular cartilage sheets

Xue, Ji Xin, Gong, Yi Yi, Zhou, Guang Dong, Liu, Wei, Cao, Yilin, Zhang, Wen Jie·2012·Biomaterials

Abstract

Acellular cartilage sheets (ACSs) have been used as scaffolds for engineering cartilage with mature chondrocytes. In this study we investigated whether ACSs possess a chondrogenic induction activity that may benefit cartilage engineering with multipotent stem cells. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) isolated from newborn pigs were expanded in vitro and seeded on ACSs that were then stacked layer-by-layer to form BMSC-ACS constructs. Cells seeded on polyglycolic acid/polylactic acid (PGA/PLA) scaffolds served as a control. After 4 weeks of culture with or without additional chondrogenic factors, constructs were subcutaneously implanted into nude mice for another 4 weeks. Cartilage-like tissues were formed after 4 weeks of culture. However, formation of cartilage with a typical lacunar structure was only observed in induced groups. RT-PCR showed that aggrecan, COMP, type II collagen and Sox9 were expressed in all groups except the non-induced BMSC-PGA/PLA group. At 4 weeks post-implantation, cartilage formation was achieved in the induced BMSC-ACS group and partial cartilage formation was achieved in the non-induced BMSC-ACS group, confirmed by safranin O staining, toluidine blue staining and type II collagen immunostaining. In addition, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay demonstrated the presence of transforming growth factor-β1, insulin-like growth factor-1 and bone morphogenic protein-2 in ACSs. These results indicate that ACSs possess a chondrogenic induction activity that promotes BMSC differentiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 117

Authors
Xue, J. X., Gong, Y. Y., Zhou, G. D., Liu, W., Cao, Y., & Zhang, W. J.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Cao, Yilin
  • Zhang, Wen Jie
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
33
Issue
24
Pages
5832-5840
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060551614
Cited by
117
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
chondrogenic differentiation, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, cartilage tissue engineering, cartilage scaffolds, type II collagen, SOX9, growth factors, bone morphogenic protein-2, insulin-like growth factor I, TGF-β1, subcutaneous implantation
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone Marrow Cells, Cartilage, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Swine, Chondrocytes, Chondrogenesis, Tissue Engineering, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review