Cited by 149Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsAntimicrobial agents and applicationsNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

Nitric oxide-releasing chitosan oligosaccharides as antibacterial agents

Open access
Lu, Yuan, Slomberg, Danielle L., Schoenfisch, Mark H.·2014·Biomaterials

Abstract

Secondary amine-functionalized chitosan oligosaccharides of different molecular weights (i.e., ~2500, 5000, 10,000) were synthesized by grafting 2-methyl aziridine from the primary amines on chitosan oligosaccharides, followed by reaction with nitric oxide (NO) gas under basic conditions to yield N-diazeniumdiolate NO donors. The total NO storage, maximum NO flux, and half-life of the resulting NO-releasing chitosan oligosaccharides were controlled by the molar ratio of 2-methyl aziridine to primary amines (e.g., 1:1, 2:1) and the functional group surrounding the N-diazeniumdiolates (e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains), respectively. The secondary amine-modified chitosan oligosaccharides greatly increased the NO payload over existing biodegradable macromolecular NO donors. In addition, the water-solubility of the chitosan oligosaccharides enabled their penetration across the extracellular polysaccharides matrix of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and association with embedded bacteria. The effectiveness of these chitosan oligosaccharides at biofilm eradication was shown to depend on both the molecular weight and ionic characteristics. Low molecular weight and cationic chitosan oligosaccharides exhibited rapid association with bacteria throughout the entire biofilm, leading to enhanced biofilm killing. At concentrations resulting in 5-log killing of bacteria in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) biofilms, the NO-releasing and control chitosan oligosaccharides elicited no significant cytotoxicity to mouse fibroblast L929 cells in vitro.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biodegradable polymers such as citrate-based or saccharide-based polymers (dextran, chitosan) are attractive scaffolds for NO delivery because of natural occurrence, biodegradability, tolerability to mammalian cells, and accessibility for NO donor functionalization.

    “Lastly, several biodegradable polymers, such as citrate-based225 or saccharide-based polymers (e.g., dextran227,244 and chitosan86,87,220) provide very attractive scaffolds for NO delivery because of their natural occurrence, biodegradability, tolerability to mammalian cells and accessibility for NO donor functionalization reactions.220,244,245”
  • The dose of NO required to kill bacteria (e.g., 200 ppm gaseous NO) does not show cytotoxic effects in human dermal fibroblasts when exposed for 48 h.

    “Moreover, the dose of NO required to kill bacteria (e.g., 200 ppm of gaseous NO)281,282,285 does not show any cytotoxic effects in human dermal fibroblasts when exposed for 48 h.216,220”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 149

Authors
Lu, Y., Slomberg, D. L., & Schoenfisch, M. H.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Schoenfisch, Mark H.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
1716-1724
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972432360
Cited by
149
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
National Institute of Health (EB000708)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Keywords
nitric oxide donors, chitooligosaccharides, N-diazeniumdiolates, antibacterial agents, Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm, biofilm eradication, molecular weight effects, cationic polymers, polyethylene glycol, cytotoxicity
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Nitric Oxide, Oligosaccharides, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Biofilms, Bioreactors, Chitosan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review