Cited by 117Immune cells in cancerNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Gemcitabine nanoparticles promote antitumor immunity against melanoma

Open access
Zhang, Yuan, Bush, Xin, Yan, Bingfang, Chen, Justin A.·2019·Biomaterials

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) promote tumor-mediated immunosuppression and cancer progression. Gemcitabine (Gem) is a MDSC-depleting chemotherapeutic agent; however, its clinical use is hampered by its drug resistance and inefficient in vivo delivery. Here we describe a strategy to formulate a Gem analogue gemcitabine monophosphate (GMP) into a lipid-coated calcium phosphate (LCP) nanoparticle, and investigate its antitumor immunity and therapeutic effects after systemic administrations. In the syngeneic mouse model of B16F10 melanoma, compared with free Gem, the LCP-formulated GMP (LCP-GMP) significantly induced apoptosis and reduced immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment (TME). LCP-GMP effectively depleted MDSCs and regulatory T cells, and skewed macrophage polarization towards the antitumor M1 phenotype in the TME, leading to enhanced CD8+ T-cell immune response and profound tumor growth inhibition. Thus, engineering the in vivo delivery of MDSC-depleting agents using nanotechnology could substantially modulate immunosuppressive TME and boost T-cell immune response for enhanced antitumor efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 117

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Li B, Lyophilization of cationic lipid-protamine-DNA (LPD) complexes. J Pharm Sci 89, 355– 364 (2000). 10707016

Authors
Zhang, Y., Bush, X., Yan, B., & Chen, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Rhode Island (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Yuan
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
189
Pages
48-59
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896879364
Cited by
117
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM115677)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
myeloid-derived suppressor cells, melanoma, antitumor immunity, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, regulatory T cells, macrophage polarization, CD8+ T cell responses, drug delivery, B16F10 melanoma, nanoparticle formulation
MeSH terms
Gemcitabine, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Calcium Phosphates, Deoxycytidine, Drug Carriers, Female, Immune Tolerance, Melanoma, Experimental, Mice, Inbred C57BL, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Nanoparticles, Tumor Microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review