Intestinal organoids: A new paradigm for engineering intestinal epithelium in vitro
Abstract
In recent years, the advent of intestinal organoid culture systems has revolutionized in vitro studies of the small intestine epithelium. Intestinal organoids are derived from self-organizing and self-renewing intestinal stem cells and closely recapitulate the native intestinal epithelium. They therefore represent a more physiologically-relevant in vitro model than conventional cell cultures for studying intestinal development, biology and pathophysiology. Moreover, they represent a promising and unprecedented new tool in the realm of regenerative and personalized medicine. In this review, we outline the current approaches to develop intestinal organoids and describe the strategies used to induce complexity, multicellularity and modularity in organoid culture systems; this knowledge will contribute to improved biomimicry of the organoid culture system. We focus on co-culture systems and explore the convergence of organoid technology and engineering principals. Finally, we describe applications of intestinal organoids in various fields.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A crypt-villus-like architecture is considered an important indicator that intestinal organoid establishment succeeded, reflecting differentiation and maturation.
“Classical crypt-villus-like architecture is regarded as an important symbol of the successful organoid establishment, exhibiting the proper branching morphology with robust multicellular composition and location reflecting the organoids differentiation and maturation level118,119.”
From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [118]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 291 · Cited by 98
- Authors
- Rahmani, S., Breyner, N. M., Su, H.-M., Verdu, E. F., & Didar, T. F.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Didar, Tohid F.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 194
- Pages
- 195-214
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904869442
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 291
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- McMaster Faculty of Engineering
- McMaster University, Canada
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Keywords
- intestinal organoids, intestinal epithelium, intestinal stem cells, organoid culture, co-culture model, biomimetic systems, regenerative medicine, personalized medicine, small intestine development, organoid engineering
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Organoids, Stem Cells, Coculture Techniques, Tissue Engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review