Aligned microfiber-induced macrophage polarization to guide schwann-cell-enabled peripheral nerve regeneration
Abstract
Mechanistic understanding of the topological cues delivered by biomaterials in promotion of oriented tissue regeneration (e.g., peripheral nerve regrowth) remains largely elusive. Here, we engineered nerve conduits composed of oriented microfiber-bundle cores and randomly organized nanofiber sheaths to particularly interrogate the regulatory mechanism of microfiber orientation on promoted peripheral nerve regeneration. With comprehensive yet systematic analyses, we were able to elucidate the intricate cascade of biological responses associated with conduit-assisted nerve regrowth, i.e., oriented microfibers facilitated macrophage recruitment and subsequent polarization toward a pro-healing phenotype, which in turn promoted Schwann cell (SC) migration, myelinization and axonal extension. Pronounced improvement of nerve regeneration in rat sciatic nerve injury was evidenced with enhanced electrophysiologic function, sciatic functional index and alleviated muscle atrophy 3 months post-implantation. The obtained results offer essential insights on the topological regulation of biomaterials in functional nerve tissue regeneration via immune modulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies demonstrated that fiber diameter and organization within the scaffold structure influence macrophage polarization and the degree of the inflammatory response.
“For example, several studies demonstrated that fiber diameter and organization within the scaffold structure influence macrophage polarization and the degree of the inflammatory response [211,212,213].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [212]
Results suggested that aligned fibers with bigger diameter sizes were more favorable for M2 polarization.
“Results suggested that aligned fibers with bigger diameter sizes were more favorable for M2 polarization.”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [212]
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625 · see citing works
Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation
Mosser, D. M., & Edwards, J. P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2448 · Cited by 9,144 · see citing works
Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease
Wynn, T. A., Chawla, A., & Pollard, J. W. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12034 · Cited by 4,684 · see citing works
Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration
Gu, X., Ding, F., & Williams, D. F. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.064 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Effect of modulating macrophage phenotype on peripheral nerve repair
Mokarram, N., Merchant, A., Mukhatyar, V., Patel, G., & Bellamkonda, R. V. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.050 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Spatial confinement downsizes the inflammatory response of macrophages
Jain, N., & Vogel, V. (2018) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-018-0190-6 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Zhou, W., Rahman, M. S. U., Sun, C., Li, S., Zhang, N., Chen, H., Han, C. C., Xu, S., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202307805 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dong, X., Liu, S., Yang, Y., Gao, S., Li, W., Cao, J., Wan, Y., Huang, Z., Fan, G., Chen, Q., Wang, H., Zhu, M., & Kong, D.
- Affiliations
- Nankai University (CN)
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Hongjun
- Zhu, Meifeng
- Kong, Deling
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 272
- Pages
- 120767
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3141541384
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- China Scholarship Council
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972063, 81774050, 81921004, 81904054, 81530059)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Keywords
- peripheral nerve regeneration, nerve conduits, macrophage polarization, Schwann cells, myelination, axonal extension, sciatic nerve injury, immunomodulation, muscle atrophy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Macrophages, Nerve Regeneration, Schwann Cells, Sciatic Nerve, Rats, Peripheral Nerve Injuries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review