Cited by 122RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryBarrier Structure and Function Studies

An optimized ionizable cationic lipid for brain tumor-targeted siRNA delivery and glioblastoma immunotherapy

Liu, Shuhan, Liu, Ji, Li, Haisong, Mao, Kuirong, Wang, Haorui, Meng, Xiandi, Wang, Jialiang, Wu, Chenxi +8 more·2022·Biomaterials

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor with a high mortality rate. Immunotherapy has achieved promising clinical results in multiple cancers, but shows unsatisfactory outcome in GBM patients, and poor drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is believed to be one of the main limitations that hinder the therapeutic efficacy of drugs. Herein, a new cationic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) that can efficiently deliver siRNA across BBB and target mouse brain is prepared for modulating the tumor microenvironment for GBM immunotherapy. By designing and screening cationic LNPs with different ionizable amine headgroups, a lipid (named as BAMPA-O16B) is identified with an optimal acid dissociation constant (pKa) that significantly enhances the cellular uptake and endosomal escape of siRNA lipoplex in mouse GBM cells. Importantly, BAMPA-O16B/siRNA lipoplex is highly effective to deliver siRNA against CD47 and PD-L1 across the BBB into cranial GBM in mice, and downregulate target gene expression in the tumor, resulting in synergistically activating a T cell-dependent antitumor immunity in orthotopic GBM. Collectively, this study offers an effective strategy for brain targeted siRNA delivery and gene silencing by optimizing the physicochemical property of LNPs. The effectiveness of modulating immune environment of GBM could further be expanded for potential treatment of other brain tumors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121645

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, S., Liu, J., Li, H., Mao, K., Wang, H., Meng, X., Wang, J., Wu, C., Chen, H., Wang, X., Cong, X., Hou, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, M., Yang, Y.-G., & Sun, T.
Affiliations
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Haorui
  • Wang, Jialiang
  • Wang, Xin
  • Wang, Ye
  • Wang, Ming
  • Yang, Yong-Guang
  • Sun, Tianmeng
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
287
Pages
121645
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283385652
Cited by
122
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 1
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Jilin Scientific and Technological Development Program
  • NSFC
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
glioblastoma, siRNA delivery, cationic lipid nanoparticles, blood-brain barrier, brain tumor targeting, CD47, PD-L1, tumor microenvironment, antitumor immunity, lipoplexes, endosomal escape, gene silencing, orthotopic brain tumor model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review