Cited by 87Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementSoil and Land Suitability Analysis

Resource evaluation of typical energy plants and possible functional zone planning in China

Shao, Hongbo, Chu, Liye·2008·Biomass and Bioenergy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 87

Authors
Shao, H., & Chu, L.
Affiliations
Qingdao University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Shao, Hongbo
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
283-288
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084639036
Cited by
87
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
Keywords
energy plants, energy crops, oil plants, seed oil content, natural habitats, ecological zoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review