Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large uncertainty in life cycle analyses is associated with N2O emissions from feedstock production.
“A large uncertainty in LCAs is associated with N 2 O emissions from feedstock production (St Clair et al., 2008).”
From Land‐use change to bioenergy production in <scp>E</scp> urope: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon (2012) · cites this paper as St Clair et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 116
- Authors
- Clair, S. S., Hillier, J., & Smith, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Pete
- ORCID
- Smith, Pete
- Venue
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 442-452
- ISSN
- 0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043654290
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 16.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Keywords
- greenhouse gas emissions, energy crops, short rotation coppice, Miscanthus, oilseed rape, biofuels, land use change, nitrogen fertilization, nitrous oxide emissions, soil carbon loss, arable land, grassland, broadleaf forest, life cycle assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
