Cited by 179Forest Biomass Utilization and ManagementAgricultural and Food SciencesForest Management and Policy

Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations

Spinelli, Raffaele, Visser, Rien J.M.·2009·Biomass and Bioenergy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.08.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spinelli, R., & Visser, R. J. M.
Affiliations
  • Istituto per la Valorizzazione del Legno e delle Specie Arboree (IT)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
429-433
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092468610
Cited by
179
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
14.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
wood chipping, delay analysis, time and motion study, equipment utilization, forest operations, operations management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review