The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass at high-solids loadings – A review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Enzymatic hydrolysis is the unit operation in the lignocellulose conversion process that utilizes enzymes to depolymerize lignocellulosic biomass. The saccharide components released are the feedstock for fermentation. When performed at high-solids loadings (≥15% solids, w/w), enzymatic hydrolysis potentially offers many advantages over conversions performed at low- or moderate-solids loadings, including increased sugar and ethanol concentrations and decreased capital and operating costs. The goal of this review is to provide a consolidated source of information on studies using high-solids loadings in enzymatic hydrolysis. Included in this review is a brief discussion of the limitations, such as a lack of available water, difficulty with mixing and handling, insufficient mass and heat transfer, and increased concentration of inhibitors, associated with the use of high solids, as well as descriptions and findings of studies that performed enzymatic hydrolysis at high-solids loadings. Reactors designed and/or equipped for improved handling of high-solids slurries are also discussed. Lastly, this review includes a brief discussion of some of the operations that have successfully scaled-up and implemented high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis at pilot- and demonstration-scale facilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Commercializing lignocellulosic bioethanol: technology bottlenecks and possible remedies
Banerjee, S., Mudliar, S., Sen, R., Giri, B., Satpute, D., Chakrabarti, T., & Pandey, R. A. (2010) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.188 · Cited by 377
Cited by
Bioethanol production from renewable sources: Current perspectives and technological progress
Zabed, H., Sahu, J. N., Suely, A., Boyce, A. N., & Faruq, G. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.076 · Cited by 852
da Silva, A. S., Espinheira, R. P., Teixeira, R. S. S., de Souza, M. F., Ferreira-Leitão, V., & Bon, E. P. S. (2020) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-020-01697-w · Cited by 322
Bioreactor design for enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass under the biorefinery concept
Pino, M. S., Rodríguez-Jasso, R. M., Michelin, M., Flores-Gallegos, A. C., Morales-Rodriguez, R., Teixeira, J. A., & Ruiz, H. A. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.057 · Cited by 207
Characterizing variability in lignocellulosic biomass: a review
Yan, J., Oyedeji, O., Leal, J. H., Donohoe, B. S., Semelsberger, T. A., Li, C., Hoover, A. N., Webb, E., Bose, E. A., Zeng, Y., et al. (2020) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06263 · Cited by 134
Romaní, A., Ruiz, H. A., Teixeira, J. A., & Domingues, L. (2016) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.106 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Modenbach, A. A., & Nokes, S. E.
- Venue
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 526-544
- ISSN
- 0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975770869
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass at high-solids loadings – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.031
- The paper
- Modenbach, A. A., & Nokes, S. E. (2013). Enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass at high-solids loadings – A review. Biomass and Bioenergy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.05.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
