Cited by 43Forest Biomass Utilization and ManagementMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementAgricultural and Food Sciences

Energy and climate impact assessment of waste wood recovery in Switzerland

Open access
Bergeron, Francis C.·2016·Biomass and Bioenergy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.009

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergeron, F. C.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Bergeron, Francis C.
Venue
Biomass and Bioenergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
94
Pages
245-257
ISSN
0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520260166
Cited by
43
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Université de Genève
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
Keywords
wood waste, energy recovery, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, waste-to-energy, logging, incineration, material flow analysis, Swiss forests, scenario analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review