Dual production of bioenergy in heterotrophic cultures of cyanobacteria: process performance, carbon balance, biofuel quality and sustainability metrics
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Preliminary life cycle assessment of heterotrophically cultivated Phormidium autumnale reported a water footprint of 1.08 m3 per m3 of bioreactor for a 5-day operation.
“To better illustrate these environmental implications, preliminary life cycle assessments of Phormidium autumnale cultivated heterotrophically reported a global warming potential of 171.05 kg CO2 eq m-3 of bioreactor, a water footprint of 1.08 m3 m-3 of bioreactor, and an ozone depletion potential of 1.83 × 10−5 kg CFC11 eq m-3 of bioreactor, for an operation period of 5 days (Jacob-Lopes et al.,”
From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Jacob-Lopes et al., 2020
Preliminary life cycle assessment of heterotrophically cultivated Phormidium autumnale reported an ozone depletion potential of 1.83 × 10−5 kg CFC11 eq per m3 of bioreactor for a 5-day operation.
“To better illustrate these environmental implications, preliminary life cycle assessments of Phormidium autumnale cultivated heterotrophically reported a global warming potential of 171.05 kg CO2 eq m-3 of bioreactor, a water footprint of 1.08 m3 m-3 of bioreactor, and an ozone depletion potential of 1.83 × 10−5 kg CFC11 eq m-3 of bioreactor, for an operation period of 5 days (Jacob-Lopes et al.,”
From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Jacob-Lopes et al., 2020
Preliminary life cycle assessment of heterotrophically cultivated Phormidium autumnale reported a global warming potential of 171.05 kg CO2 eq per m3 of bioreactor for a 5-day operation.
“To better illustrate these environmental implications, preliminary life cycle assessments of Phormidium autumnale cultivated heterotrophically reported a global warming potential of 171.05 kg CO2 eq m-3 of bioreactor, a water footprint of 1.08 m3 m-3 of bioreactor, and an ozone depletion potential of 1.83 × 10−5 kg CFC11 eq m-3 of bioreactor, for an operation period of 5 days (Jacob-Lopes et al.,”
From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Jacob-Lopes et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Jacob-Lopes, E., Santos, A. B., Severo, I. A., Deprá, M. C., Maroneze, M. M., & Zepka, L. Q.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
- Venue
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 142
- Pages
- 105756
- ISSN
- 0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3085024311
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Keywords
- cyanobacteria, heterotrophic cultivation, single cell oil, biodiesel, volatile organic compounds, carbon balance, fatty acid composition, net energy ratio, life cycle assessment, sustainability indicators, microalgae, biomass productivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
