Cited by 301Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Modafinil improves cognition and response inhibition in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Turner, Danielle C, Clark, Luke, Dowson, Jonathan, Robbins, Trevor W, Sahakian, Barbara J·2004·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Modafinil, a novel cognitive enhancer, has a clinical profile similar to conventional stimulants such as methylphenidate, despite a seemingly different mechanism of action. Modafinil selectively improves neuropsychological task performance in healthy volunteers, possibly through improved inhibitory control. We examined whether modafinil induced similar improvements in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Methods Twenty patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were entered into a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study using a single 200 mg dose of modafinil.Results Modafinil produced a similar pattern of cognitive enhancement to that observed in healthy adults, with improvements on tests of short-term memory span, visual memory, spatial planning, and stop-signal motor inhibition. On several measures, increased accuracy was accompanied by slowed response latency. This alteration in the speed-accuracy trade-off may indicate that modafinil increases the ability to "reflect" on problems coupled with decreased impulsive responding. Improvements were also seen in sustained attention, which was unaffected in healthy subjects.Conclusions If these benefits are shown to be maintained with chronic administration, modafinil may have potential as an important therapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with a similar effect to stimulants such as methylphenidate in improving stop-signal response inhibition but without the side effects commonly experienced with amphetamine-like drugs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.02.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 301

Authors
Turner, D. C., Clark, L., Dowson, J., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
55
Issue
10
Pages
1031-1040
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085106576
Cited by
301
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
modafinil, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, cognitive enhancement, response inhibition, stop-signal task, speed-accuracy trade-off, sustained attention, short-term memory, visual memory, spatial planning, adults, methylphenidate
MeSH terms
Modafinil, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Benzhydryl Compounds, Blood Pressure, Cognition, Decision Making, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Pain Measurement, Psychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review