Modafinil improves cognition and response inhibition in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Abstract
Background Modafinil, a novel cognitive enhancer, has a clinical profile similar to conventional stimulants such as methylphenidate, despite a seemingly different mechanism of action. Modafinil selectively improves neuropsychological task performance in healthy volunteers, possibly through improved inhibitory control. We examined whether modafinil induced similar improvements in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Methods Twenty patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were entered into a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study using a single 200 mg dose of modafinil.Results Modafinil produced a similar pattern of cognitive enhancement to that observed in healthy adults, with improvements on tests of short-term memory span, visual memory, spatial planning, and stop-signal motor inhibition. On several measures, increased accuracy was accompanied by slowed response latency. This alteration in the speed-accuracy trade-off may indicate that modafinil increases the ability to "reflect" on problems coupled with decreased impulsive responding. Improvements were also seen in sustained attention, which was unaffected in healthy subjects.Conclusions If these benefits are shown to be maintained with chronic administration, modafinil may have potential as an important therapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with a similar effect to stimulants such as methylphenidate in improving stop-signal response inhibition but without the side effects commonly experienced with amphetamine-like drugs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modafinil enhances sustained attention in ADHD patients.
“enhance sustained attention in ADHD patients118”
From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [118]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 301
- Authors
- Turner, D. C., Clark, L., Dowson, J., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1031-1040
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085106576
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 14.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- modafinil, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, cognitive enhancement, response inhibition, stop-signal task, speed-accuracy trade-off, sustained attention, short-term memory, visual memory, spatial planning, adults, methylphenidate
- MeSH terms
- Modafinil, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Benzhydryl Compounds, Blood Pressure, Cognition, Decision Making, Double-Blind Method, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Pain Measurement, Psychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review