Variation in catechol-o-methyltransferase val158 met genotype associated with schizotypy but not cognition: A population study in 543 young men
Abstract
Background Increased catechol-O-methyltransferase activity associated with variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase valine158 methionine genotypes may result in reduced dopamine neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex and thus contribute to the poor performance of frontally mediated cognitive tasks and the occurrence of associated negative symptoms observed in patients with schizophrenia; however, reported associations between catechol-O-methyltransferase valine158 methionine genotypes and measures of cognition have not been consistent. Methods Catechol-O-methyltransferase genotyping, measures of schizotypy, cognitive measures of memory and attention, as well as the antisaccade eye movement task, a measure sensitive to prefrontal cortical function, were obtained in a sample of 543 young men representative for that age group (mean age 21 years). Results None of the cognitive measures was associated with catechol-O-methyltransferase valine158 methionine genotypes; however, there was an effect of high-activity allele loading on schizotypy, in particular the negative and disorganization dimensions. Conclusions Previously reported inconsistencies in the relationship between catechol-O-methyltransferase valine158 methionine genotypes and cognition were not resolved; however, catechol-O-methyltransferase genotype may affect expression of negative schizotypy by direct or indirect effects on central dopamine neurotransmitter signaling.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Schizotypy scores in healthy subjects vary based on differences in dopamine metabolising (COMT) enzymes.
“studies showed that schizotypy scores in healthy subjects vary based on the difference in dopamine metabolising (COMT) enzymes (Smyrnis et al., 2007; Stefanis et al., 2004)”
From Systematic reviews of the acute effects of amphetamine on working memory and other cognitive performances in healthy individuals, with a focus on the potential influence of personality traits (2023) · cites this paper as Stefanis et al., 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Stefanis, N. C., Os, J. V., Avramopoulos, D., Smyrnis, N., Evdokimidis, I., Hantoumi, I., & Stefanis, C. N.
- Affiliations
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- University Mental Health Research Institute (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Stefanis, Nicholas C.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 510-515
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062756480
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 9.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Keywords
- catechol-O-methyltransferase, schizotypy, cognitive function, dopamine signaling, prefrontal cortex, antisaccade task, memory, attention, negative symptoms, schizophrenia, young men
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Cognition, Dopamine, Eye Movements, Genotype, Humans, Male, Memory, Methionine, Neuropsychological Tests, Schizotypal Personality Disorder, Valine, Prefrontal Cortex, Amino Acid Substitution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review