Cited by 92Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Pharmacogenomics

McGough, James J.·2005·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Although the efficacy of medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is well demonstrated in clinical trials, substantial numbers of patients fail to remain on therapy, and there is tremendous variability in tolerability and treatment acceptance. The emerging science of pharmacogenomics seeks to identify patterns of genetic variation that will direct individually tailored treatment regimens and enhance long-term adherence. For this review, existing studies in ADHD pharmacogenomics were reviewed to assess current knowledge and provide a basis for planning future research. Twelve studies were identified. The majority investigated the role of candidate genes in predicting clinical response to methylphenidate. The most frequently studied is DAT1, although findings are inconsistent, with the 10-repeat polymorphism predicting both increased and decreased symptom reduction in various reports. Other candidates include DRD4, DRD5, DBH, 5HTT, SNAP-25, and COMT. One study was based on quantitative trait analyses in a genome-wide scan. Although interest in ADHD pharmacogenomics is encouraging, preliminary studies have been limited by small sample sizes, inconsistent research designs, retrospective reports, and a focus on symptom response. Future studies should emphasize large, prospective trials, assess multiple medications in individual subjects, and consider a full range of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To date, most work on using neurobiology to tailor ADHD treatment has been done in pharmacogenetics.

    “To date, most of this work has been done in the area of pharmacogenetics”

    From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [132]

  • Pharmacogenetic research on ADHD treatment, although promising, cannot yet guide treatment choices.

    “which, although promising, cannot yet guide treatment choices [132-134]”

    From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [132]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 92

Authors
McGough, J. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
McGough, James J.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
57
Issue
11
Pages
1367-1373
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065777803
Cited by
92
References
76
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH001966, K23 MH01966)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, pharmacogenomics, methylphenidate, candidate genes, DAT1, DRD4, DRD5, DBH, SNAP-25, catechol-O-methyltransferase, treatment response prediction, medication adherence, treatment tolerability, personalized treatment
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Electroencephalography, Humans, Methylphenidate, Pharmacogenetics, Genetic Variation, Dopamine Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review