Cited by 193Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Bupropion XL in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A randomized, placebo-controlled study

Wilens, Timothy E., Haight, Barbara R., Horrigan, Joseph P., Hudziak, James J., Rosenthal, Norman E., Connor, Daniel F., Hampton, Kenneth D., Richard, Nathalie E. +1 more·2005·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Data remain limited on treatment strategies for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of an extended-release, once-daily formulation of bupropion (XL) in the treatment of adults with ADHD.Methods This multisite, placebo-controlled, 8-week prospective trial evaluated 162 adult patients diagnosed with ADHD (combined and inattentive types). Subjects were treated with up to 450 mg/day of bupropion XL. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of ADHD responders (defined as at least a 30% reduction in the investigator-rated ADHD Rating Scale score) at week 8 (last observation carried forward [LOCF]).Results Bupropion XL responders (53%) exceeded placebo responders (31%) (p =.004 at week 8) with a significantly greater proportion of bupropion XL responders as early as week 2 (p = .01). Treatment effect size calculated for the ADHD Rating Scale total score was .6. Bupropion XL appeared to provide sustained benefit throughout the day compared with placebo (morning p =.033, afternoon p =.004, evening p = .024). Bupropion XL was safe and well tolerated, with no serious or unexpected adverse events and a low rate of drug-related study discontinuation (5%).Conclusions The results from this multisite study indicate that bupropion XL is an effective and well-tolerated nonstimulant treatment for adult ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.01.027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 193

Authors
Wilens, T. E., Haight, B. R., Horrigan, J. P., Hudziak, J. J., Rosenthal, N. E., Connor, D. F., Hampton, K. D., Richard, N. E., & Modell, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
57
Issue
7
Pages
793-801
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093587140
Cited by
193
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adult ADHD, sustained-release formulation, ADHD Rating Scale, treatment efficacy, drug safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Demography, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Placebos, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Time Factors, Bupropion, Treatment Outcome, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review