ABT-089, A Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor Partial Agonist, for the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: Results of a Pilot Study
Abstract
Background This pilot study was designed to evaluate ABT-089, a neuronal nicotinic receptor partial agonist, as treatment for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Methods Adults with ADHD received placebo, 2 mg, 4 mg, or 20 mg of ABT-089 for 2 weeks each in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4 x 4 Latin square design for a total of 8 weeks. In addition to the primary outcome, the Conner's Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS), secondary rating scales, and neuropsychological and safety assessments were completed.Results A total of 11 adults with well-characterized ADHD completed this crossover study. ABT-089 b.i.d. was superior to placebo for the CAARS Total Symptom Score, which was the primary endpoint (placebo: 38.0 +/- 1.9; 2 mg b.i.d.: 32.2 +/- 1.9, one-tail p = .021; 4 mg b.i.d.: 33.2 +/- 1.9, p = .047; 20 mg b.i.d.: 33.5 +/- 1.9, p = .056). ABT-089 was also superior to placebo for the CAARS ADHD Index and Hyperactive/Impulsive scores and the Clinical Global Impression-ADHD Severity score. On the clinical efficacy endpoints, CAARS Total Symptom Score and CAARS Hyperactive/Impulsive score, a shallow inverted U-shaped dose-response curve was observed; however, the dose-response curve for attention and memory effects as measured by computerized cognitive testing seemed dose-linear. No clinically meaningful findings in safety assessments or side effect profile were observed.Conclusions Data from this pilot study suggest that ABT-089 might be effective in treating adult ADHD and that it is well tolerated. On the basis of these promising results, larger, parallel-group ABT-089 studies of longer duration are warranted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Agonists selective for α4β2* nAChRs produce more robust and clinically promising enhancement of attention and related cognitive abilities than nicotine.
“Recent studies have indicated that agonists selective for α4β2* nAChRs produce perhaps more robust and clinically more promising enhancement of attention and related cognitive abilities (Potter et al, 1999; Wilens et al, 1999; Wilens et al, 2006; Dunbar et al, 2007; Wilens and Decker, 2007).”
From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Wilens et al, 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- Wilens, T. E., Verlinden, M. H., Adler, L. A., Wozniak, P. J., & West, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Abbott (United States) (US)
- VA NY Harbor Healthcare System (US)
- CNS Healthcare (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wilens, Timothy E.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1065-1070
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044210997
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 8.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Abbott Laboratories
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, adult ADHD, hyperactivity/impulsivity, dose-response relationship, drug safety, cognitive effects
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Cognition, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Pyridines, Pyrrolidines, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Nicotinic Agonists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review