Cited by 268Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and Perception

Affective Neural Circuitry During Facial Emotion Processing in Pediatric Bipolar Disorder

Open access
Pavuluri, Mani N., O‘Connor, Megan Marlow, Harral, Erin, Sweeney, John A.·2007·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Facial emotions are central to human interaction. Identifying pathophysiology in affect processing circuitry that supports the ability to assess facial emotions might facilitate understanding of affect regulation in pediatric bipolar disorder.Methods Ten euthymic, unmedicated pediatric bipolar patients and 10 healthy control subjects matched for age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, and IQ were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Angry, happy, and neutral faces were presented in 30-sec blocks, with a 20-sec rest period between blocks. Subjects were asked to press a button when each face appeared, to ensure that attention was maintained on-task.Results In bipolar patients, in response to both angry and happy faces relative to neutral faces, we observed reduced activation of right rostral ventrolateral prefrontal cortex together with increased activity in right pregenual anterior cingulate, amygdala, and paralimbic cortex. Bipolar patients also showed reduced activation of visual areas in occipital cortex together with greater activation in higher-order visual perceptual areas, including superior temporal sulcus and fusiform gyrus with angry faces and posterior parietal cortex with happy faces.Conclusions Findings document a disturbance in affective neurocircuitry in pediatric bipolar disorder. Reduced activation in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex might reflect diminished top-down control that leads to the observed exaggerated activation in amygdala and paralimbic areas. Changes in occipital areas might represent an effort to gate sensory input when affective responses to the faces could not be successfully modulated. Disturbances in affect processing circuitry could contribute to emotional dysregulation and social cognitive difficulties in bipolar youth.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During passive viewing paradigms, patients with bipolar disorder and those with MDD demonstrate hypoactivity in the DLPFC and OFC and hyperactivity in the amygdala and anterior cingulate (subgenual and pregenual), although evidence is less consistent for subcortical regions such as the amygdala and paralimbic regions.

    “During passive viewing paradigms, patients with bipolar disorder and those with MDD demonstrate hypoactivity in the DLPFC and OFC and hyperactivity in the amygdala and anterior cingulate (subgenual and pregenual), although evidence is less consistent for subcortical regions such as the amygdala and paralimbic regions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 268

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schenkel LS, Marlow O'Connor M, Moss M, Sweeney JA, Pavuluri MN (in press): Theory of mind and social inference in pediatric bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry.

Authors
Pavuluri, M. N., O‘Connor, M. M., Harral, E., & Sweeney, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Pavuluri, Mani N.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
158-167
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050749056
Cited by
268
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 32
FWCI
13.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Research Resources (K23RR018638)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
pediatric bipolar disorder, emotional face processing, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, amygdala, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, paralimbic cortex, occipital cortex, superior temporal sulcus, fusiform gyrus, posterior parietal cortex, emotional dysregulation, top-down control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Affect, Age Factors, Amygdala, Bipolar Disorder, Cognition Disorders, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Social Perception, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review