Association of the Dopamine D4 Receptor (DRD4) Gene and Approach-Related Personality Traits: Meta-Analysis and New Data
Abstract
Background Two variants in the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene have been reported to be associated with human approach-related traits such as novelty seeking and extraversion. However, the strength of evidence for this association remains uncertain.Methods We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies of the association between the DRD4 gene variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) and C-521T polymorphisms and human approach-related personality traits, including novelty seeking, extraversion, and impulsivity, restricted to adult samples recruited from nonpsychiatric populations, and extended on this literature by attempting to confirm any evidence of association in a replication sample (n = 309) selected for extreme scores on the extraversion subscale of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire from a large (n = 40,090) population-based sample.Results Our initial meta-analysis supported the association of the DRD4 C-521T polymorphism, but not the VNTR polymorphism, with approach-related traits. This conclusion was qualified by evidence of significant publication bias and the failure to detect association in a replication sample comprising individuals at the extremes of the trait distribution. The association of the C-521T polymorphism observed in our initial meta-analysis was robust to the inclusion of these new data, but our revised meta-analysis indicated that the association was present for measures of novelty seeking and impulsivity but not for measures of extraversion.Conclusions The DRD4 gene may be associated with measures of novelty seeking and impulsivity but not extraversion. The association of the C-521T variant with these measures, if genuine, may account for up to 3% of phenotypic variance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The DRD4 48bp-VNTR was not associated with any impulsivity measure.
“The DRD448bp-VNTR was not associated with any impulsivity measure, in line with a recent meta-analytic review (which suggested that another marker on the gene might be related to impulsivity) (Munafò et al, 2008).”
From DAT1 and COMT effects on delay discounting and trait impulsivity in male adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls (2010) · cites this paper as Munafò et al, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 95 · Cited by 441
- Authors
- Munafò, M. R., Yalcin, B., Willis-Owen, S. A., & Flint, J.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
- ORCID
- Yalcin, Binnaz
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-206
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060185947
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- dopamine D4 receptor, DRD4 gene, variable number tandem repeats, novelty seeking, extraversion, impulsivity, genetic association, publication bias, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Polymorphism, Genetic, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Logistic Models, Databases, Bibliographic, Receptors, Dopamine D4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review