Cited by 247Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Olfaction and Taste Processing in Autism

Open access
Bennetto, Loisa, Kuschner, Emily S., Hyman, Susan L.·2007·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Autism is often associated with sensory symptoms, but few studies have examined chemosensory functions in this population. We examined olfactory and taste functioning in individuals with autism to characterize chemosensory processing and test competing hypotheses about underlying brainstem versus cortical abnormalities.Methods Twenty-one participants (10-18 years) with autism were compared with 27 well-matched control participants with typical development. Taste identification was tested via sucrose, NaCl, citric acid, and quinine solutions applied to standard locations on the anterior tongue. Taste detection thresholds were established in the same regions with electrogustometry, and olfactory identification was evaluated with "Sniffin' Sticks."Results Participants with autism were significantly less accurate than control participants in identifying sour tastes and marginally less accurate for bitter tastes, but they were not different in identifying sweet and salty stimuli. Taste detection thresholds via electrogustometry were equivalent. Olfactory identification was significantly worse among participants with autism.Conclusions True differences exist in taste and olfactory identification in autism. Impairment in taste identification with normal detection thresholds suggests cortical, rather than brainstem dysfunction. Further research is needed to determine the neurologic bases of olfactory and taste impairments, as well as the relationship of chemosensory dysfunction to other characteristics of autism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.04.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 247

Authors
Bennetto, L., Kuschner, E. S., & Hyman, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Bennetto, Loisa
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
62
Issue
9
Pages
1015-1021
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076726575
Cited by
247
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U54MH066397)
  • National Center for Research Resources (5-M01-RR-00044, M01RR000044)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, olfaction, taste perception, chemosensory processing, taste identification, odor identification, taste detection threshold, electrogustometry, Sniffin' Sticks, brainstem dysfunction, cortical dysfunction, sensory symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Child, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Odorants, Psychophysics, Quinine, Sensory Thresholds, Smell, Sodium Chloride, Sucrose, Taste, Tongue, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review