From Animal Models to Model Animals
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This decline of interest in rodent natural behavior might have inapparent consequences for distant fields of neuroscience; for example, designing useful models of psychiatric disorders is not very probable without basic knowledge about model organisms.
“This decline of interests in rodent natural behavior might have inapparent consequences for distant fields of neuroscience, for example, designing useful models of psychiatric disorders is not very probable without basic knowledge about model organisms.21”
From Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 98
- Authors
- Insel, T. R.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Mental Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Insel, Thomas R.
- ORCID
- Insel, Thomas R.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1337-1339
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972453494
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- animal models, model organisms, comparative neurobiology, species-typical behavior, mental illness, risk alleles, pathophysiology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Psychiatry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
