Cited by 261Schizophrenia research and treatmentFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesHallucinations in medical conditions

Auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia are associated with reduced functional connectivity of the temporo-parietal area

Vercammen, Ans, Knegtering, Henderikus, den Boer, Johann A., Liemburg, Edith J., Aleman, André·2010·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Schizophrenia has been conceptualized as a disorder of integration of neural activity across distributed networks. However, the relationship between specific symptom dimensions and patterns of functional connectivity remains unclear. The current study aimed to investigate the relationship between auditory-verbal hallucinations (AVH), a particularly prevalent and clinically relevant symptom in schizophrenia, and functional connectivity of the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ).Methods Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained from 27 schizophrenia patients with AVH and 27 matched control subjects. We calculated correlations reflecting functional connectivity between a priori defined regions-of-interest and the bilateral TPJ seed regions, comprising the neural network involved in inner speech processes and AVH.Results Compared with healthy control subjects, schizophrenia patients showed reduced functional connectivity between left TPJ and the right homotope of Broca. Within the patient group, more severe AVH were associated with reduced neural coupling between left TPJ and bilateral anterior cingulate as well as the bilateral amygdala.Conclusions In schizophrenia patients with chronic hallucinations, the left TPJ-a critical node in the speech perception/AVH network-shows reduced functional connectivity with brain areas involved in the attribution of agency, self-referent processing, and attentional control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 261

Authors
Vercammen, A., Knegtering, H., den Boer, J. A., Liemburg, E. J., & Aleman, A.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Vercammen, Ans
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
67
Issue
10
Pages
912-918
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977705664
Cited by
261
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 24
FWCI
14.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
schizophrenia, auditory verbal hallucinations, temporoparietal junction, functional connectivity, resting-state functional connectivity, inner speech, Broca's area, anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, symptom severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Speech Perception, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review