Cited by 68Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Simulating Neurocognitive Aging: Effects of a Dopaminergic Antagonist on Brain Activity During Working Memory

Fischer, Håkan, Nyberg, Lars, Karlsson, Sari, Karlsson, Per, Brehmer, Yvonne, Rieckmann, Anna, MacDonald, Stuart W.S., Farde, Lars +1 more·2010·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Previous correlational studies have indirectly linked dysfunctional dopaminergic neurotransmission to age-related cognitive deficits and associated reductions in task-induced functional brain activity. Methods We used an experimental-pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach to more directly examine the role of dopamine in neurocognitive aging. Twenty younger and 20 healthy older adults were included. During fMRI scanning, a spatial working memory (SWM) task was administered under two conditions, varying in cognitive load. Positron emission tomography measurements with the D1 receptor antagonist [(11)C]SCH23390 confirmed that a given experimental dose of unlabeled solution occupied 50% of D1 receptors in younger adults. Results An age-related reduction in SWM performance was observed, and fMRI data revealed that, relative to younger adults under placebo conditions, elderly persons under-recruited load-sensitive fronto-parietal regions during SWM. Critically, in younger adults, the D1 antagonist resulted in a similar reduction in SWM performance and fMRI response. Conclusions These results suggest that depletion of dopamine, whether ontogenetically or pharmacologically, results in decreased SWM performance as well as reduced load-dependent modulation of the blood oxygen level dependent signal in fronto-parietal regions, possibly by decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio in relevant neural networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.12.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 48 · Cited by 68

Authors
Fischer, H., Nyberg, L., Karlsson, S., Karlsson, P., Brehmer, Y., Rieckmann, A., MacDonald, S. W. S., Farde, L., & Bäckman, L.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Håkan
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
575-580
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064446115
Cited by
68
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Swedish Brain Power
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
neurocognitive aging, dopamine, dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, spatial working memory, cognitive load, older adults, age-related cognitive decline, signal-to-noise ratio, dopamine signaling
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Benzazepines, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Space Perception, Single-Blind Method, Dopamine Antagonists, Positron-Emission Tomography, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review