The Neural Correlates of Emotional Memory in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Abstract
Background Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is marked by intrusive, chronic, and distressing memories of highly emotional events. Previous research has highlighted the role of the amygdala and its interactions with the hippocampus in mediating the effect of enhanced memory for emotional information in healthy individuals. As the functional integrity of these regions may be compromised in PTSD, the current study examined the neural correlates of emotional memory in PTSD. Methods We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and an event-related subsequent memory recognition paradigm to study amygdala and hippocampus activation in 18 individuals with PTSD and 18 trauma-exposed non-PTSD control participants. Results Memory enhancement for negative, relative to neutral, pictures was found across all subjects, without significant differences between groups. Relative to the trauma-exposed non-PTSD group, the PTSD group showed exaggerated amygdala activation during the encoding of negative versus neutral pictures. This effect was even more pronounced when the analysis included data from only pictures that were subsequently remembered 1 week later. In the PTSD group, degree of amygdala activation during the encoding of negative versus neutral pictures was positively correlated with hippocampal activation and current PTSD symptom severity. The PTSD group also showed exaggerated hippocampal activation in response to negative pictures that were remembered versus forgotten. Finally,…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with PTSD show exaggerated activity in both the amygdala and hippocampus while recollecting negative autobiographical memories and while viewing negative pictures, and the degree of this hyperactivity correlated with symptom severity.
“For example, patients with PTSD show exaggerated activity in both the amygdala and hippocampus while recollecting negative autobiographical memories65 and while viewing negative pictures,66 and the degree of this hyperactivity correlated with symptom severity.66”
From Altered resting-state amygdala functional connectivity in men with posttraumatic stress disorder (2012) · cites this paper as [65]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 127
- Authors
- Brohawn, K. H., Offringa, R., Pfaff, D. L., Hughes, K. C., & Shin, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brohawn, Kathryn Handwerger
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1023-1030
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983091519
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Tufts University
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, emotional memory, amygdala, hippocampus, memory enhancement, negative emotional stimuli, memory encoding, PTSD symptom severity, trauma exposure
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Arousal, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review