D-cycloserine facilitates socially reinforced learning in an animal model relevant to autism spectrum disorders
Open accessAbstract
Background There are no drugs that specifically target the social deficits of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). This may be due to a lack of behavioral paradigms in animal models relevant to ASD. Partner preference formation in the prairie vole represents a social cognitive process involving socially reinforced learning. D-cycloserine (DCS) is a cognitive enhancer that acts at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor to promote learning. If DCS enhances socially reinforced learning in the partner preference paradigm, it may be useful in combination with behavioral therapies for enhancing social functioning in ASD.Methods Female prairie and meadow voles were given DCS either peripherally or directly into one of three brain regions: nucleus accumbens, amygdala, or caudate putamen. Subjects were then cohabited with a male vole under conditions that do not typically yield a partner preference. The development of a preference for that stimulus male vole over a novel male vole was assessed using a partner preference test.Results A low dose of DCS administered peripherally enhanced preference formation in prairie voles but not meadow voles under conditions in which it would not otherwise occur. These effects were replicated in prairie voles by microinfusions of DCS into the nucleus accumbens, which is involved in reinforcement learning, and the amygdala, which is involved in social information processing.Conclusions Partner preference in the prairie vole may provide a behavioral paradigm with face, construct, and predictive validity for identifying prosocial pharmacotherapeutics. D-cycloserine may be a viable treatment strategy for social deficits of ASD when paired with social behavioral therapy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pair-bond formation is a social cognitive process involving social recognition and social reward and models a human attachment relationship more closely than social interactions of adult mice or rats.
“Pair-bond formation is a social cognitive process that involves both social recognition and social reward (27–29) and models a human attachment relationship far more closely than do the social interactions of adult mice or rats.”
From Chronic intranasal oxytocin causes long-term impairments in partner preference formation in male prairie voles (2013) · cites this paper as [28]
Combining oxytocin with a structured social-skills training regimen has the potential to be a more effective treatment for social motivation impairments and other skill deficits in ASD.
“Combining oxytocin with a structured social-skills training regimen, as part of ABA [42] or computerized gaming, has the potential to be a more effective treatment for social motivation impairments and other skill deficits in ASD [177,211].”
From Social “wanting” dysfunction in autism: neurobiological underpinnings and treatment implications (2012) · cites this paper as [211]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Modi, M. E., & Young, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Modi, Meera E.
- ORCID
- Young, Larry J.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 298-304
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3164818
- OpenAlex
- W1973995413
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Autism Speaks (AS2254)
- National Institutes of Health (P51OD011132)
- National Institute of Mental Health (K02MH064692, MH064692)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR-00 165, P51RR000165)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- D-cycloserine, autism spectrum disorder, mate preferences, Microtus ochrogaster, Microtus pennsylvanicus, NMDA receptor, nucleus accumbens, amygdala, caudate-putamen, social dysfunction, pharmacotherapy, social behavior
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Arvicolinae, Cycloserine, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Social Behavior, Neostriatum, Models, Animal, Mating Preference, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review