Cited by 60Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Similar Improvement of Reward and Punishment Learning by Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Open access
Palminteri, Stefano, Clair, Anne-Hélène, Mallet, Luc, Pessiglione, Mathias·2012·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The role of dopamine in reinforcement learning has been extensively studied, but the role of other major neuromodulators, particularly serotonin, remains poorly understood. An influential theory has suggested that dopamine and serotonin represent opponent systems respectively driving reward and punishment learning.Methods To test this theory, we compared two groups of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, one unmedicated (n = 12) and one treated with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRI; n = 13). To avoid confounding basic reinforcement learning with strategic conscious reasoning, we used a subliminal conditioning task that involves subjects learning to associate masked cues with gambling outcomes to maximize their payoff. The same task was used in a previous study to demonstrate opposite effects of dopaminergic medication on reward and punishment learning.Results Unmedicated obsessive-compulsive disorder patients exhibited an instrumental learning deficit that was fully alleviated under SRI treatment. Contrary to dopaminergic medication, SRIs similarly modulated reward and punishment learning.Conclusions Thus, departing from the opponency model, our results support a beneficial role of serotonin in instrumental learning that is independent of outcome valence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.028

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Palminteri et al. demonstrated that the serotoninergic system is involved in the procedural learning deficit in OCD.

    “For example, Palminteri et al. [119], combining a computational approach with neurotransmitter modulation, demonstrated that the serotoninergic system is involved in the procedural learning deficit in OCD.”

    From Cognitive Dysfunction in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as [119]

    The Discussion reports that serotonin reuptake inhibitors restored subliminal instrumental learning performance in OCD patients, supporting an association between serotonergic modulation and this learning deficit. But it also allows that the drugs may have improved learning indirectly through other functions; it does not establish direct serotonergic involvement in procedural learning deficits generally. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • OCD patients taking SSRIs perform better on reward-learning tasks than those not taking SSRIs.

    “patients on SSRIs have been found to perform better on reward-learning tasks than patients off-SSRIs [156]”
  • Instrumental learning under both reward and punishment conditions was enhanced in OCD patients receiving SSRI treatment relative to those who were unmedicated.

    “instrumental learning under both reward and punishment conditions were enhanced in patients receiving SSRI treatment relative to those who were unmedicated (Palminteri et al., 2012)”

    From The role of habit in compulsivity (2016) · cites this paper as Palminteri et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 60

Authors
Palminteri, S., Clair, A.-H., Mallet, L., & Pessiglione, M.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Pessiglione, Mathias
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
244-250
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003118387
Cited by
60
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, reward learning, punishment learning, operant conditioning, dopamine, reinforcement learning, outcome valence
MeSH terms
Adult, Choice Behavior, Cues, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Performance, Punishment, Reward, Risk-Taking, Subliminal Stimulation, Visual Perception, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review