Cited by 82Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditions

Transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke's and right homologous sites to curtail “voices”: a randomized trial

Open access
Hoffman, Ralph E., Wu, Kun, Pittman, Brian, Cahill, John D., Hawkins, Keith A., Fernandez, Thomas, Hannestad, Jonas·2013·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Auditory/verbal hallucinations (AVHs) are accompanied by activation in Wernicke's and right homologous regions. Efficacy in curtailing AVHs via 1-Hz repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting a site in each region ("W" and "rW") was therefore studied.Methods Patients with schizophrenia and AVHs (N = 83) were randomly allocated to double-masked rTMS versus sham stimulation, with blocks of five sessions given to W and rW in random order, followed by five sessions to the site yielding greater improvement. The primary outcome measure was the Hallucination Change Score (HCS). Hallucination frequency, total auditory hallucination rating scale score, and clinical global improvement were secondary outcome measures. Attentional salience of AVHs and neuropsychological measures of laterality were studied as predictors of site-specific response.Results After 15 sessions, rTMS produced significant improvements relative to sham stimulation for hallucination frequency and clinical global improvement but not for HCS. After limiting analyses to patients whose motor threshold was detected consistently: 1) endpoint HCS demonstrated significantly greater improvement for rTMS compared with sham stimulation; 2) for high-salience AVHs, rTMS to rW after the first five sessions yielded significantly improved HCS scores relative to sham stimulation, whereas for low salience AVHs, rTMS to W produced this finding. Nondominant motor impairment correlated positively with hallucination improvement following rW rTMS.Conclusions One-hertz rTMS per our site-optimization protocol produced some clinical benefit in patients with persistent AVHs as a group, especially when motor threshold was consistently detected. Level of hallucination salience may usefully guide selection of W versus rW as intervention sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.016

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 82

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 1995 Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders – Patient Edition, Version 2.0 Biometrics Research Department, New York Psychiatric Institute

Authors
Hoffman, R. E., Wu, K., Pittman, B., Cahill, J. D., Hawkins, K. A., Fernandez, T., & Hannestad, J.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Hoffman, Ralph E.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
73
Issue
10
Pages
1008-1014
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016865331
Cited by
82
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH067073, R01MH073673, R25MH077823)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
transcranial magnetic stimulation, auditory verbal hallucinations, Wernicke's area, schizophrenia, attentional salience, motor threshold, laterality
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hallucinations, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Temporal Lobe, Treatment Outcome, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review