Transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke's and right homologous sites to curtail “voices”: a randomized trial
Open accessAbstract
Background Auditory/verbal hallucinations (AVHs) are accompanied by activation in Wernicke's and right homologous regions. Efficacy in curtailing AVHs via 1-Hz repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting a site in each region ("W" and "rW") was therefore studied.Methods Patients with schizophrenia and AVHs (N = 83) were randomly allocated to double-masked rTMS versus sham stimulation, with blocks of five sessions given to W and rW in random order, followed by five sessions to the site yielding greater improvement. The primary outcome measure was the Hallucination Change Score (HCS). Hallucination frequency, total auditory hallucination rating scale score, and clinical global improvement were secondary outcome measures. Attentional salience of AVHs and neuropsychological measures of laterality were studied as predictors of site-specific response.Results After 15 sessions, rTMS produced significant improvements relative to sham stimulation for hallucination frequency and clinical global improvement but not for HCS. After limiting analyses to patients whose motor threshold was detected consistently: 1) endpoint HCS demonstrated significantly greater improvement for rTMS compared with sham stimulation; 2) for high-salience AVHs, rTMS to rW after the first five sessions yielded significantly improved HCS scores relative to sham stimulation, whereas for low salience AVHs, rTMS to W produced this finding. Nondominant motor impairment correlated positively with hallucination improvement following rW rTMS.Conclusions One-hertz rTMS per our site-optimization protocol produced some clinical benefit in patients with persistent AVHs as a group, especially when motor threshold was consistently detected. Level of hallucination salience may usefully guide selection of W versus rW as intervention sites.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effectiveness of rTMS to the right hemisphere is dependent on attentional salience of the AVHs.
“Hoffman et al.’s most recent study (2013), showing that the effectiveness of rTMS to the right hemisphere is dependent on attentional salience of the AVHs.”
From Auditory verbal hallucinations as atypical inner speech monitoring, and the potential of neurostimulation as a treatment option (2013) · cites this paper as Hoffman et al., 2013
Hoffman et al. (2013) replicated their initial findings with a sample size of 83, with reduced effect size of .65 for reduction in frequency of AVHs, increased to .74 when only patients with consistently detectable motor threshold were included.
“Recently, Hoffman et al. (2013) replicated their initial findings with a sample size of 83, albeit it with reduced effect size of .65 for reduction in frequency of AVHs. This effect size was increased to .74 when only patients with whom they could consistently detect a motor threshold were included.”
From Auditory verbal hallucinations as atypical inner speech monitoring, and the potential of neurostimulation as a treatment option (2013) · cites this paper as Hoffman et al., 2013
Stimulation of the right homologue of Wernicke's area could lead to a reduction in frequency of AVHs, especially for those rated high in attentional salience.
“They also showed that stimulation of the right homologue of Wernicke's area could lead to a reduction in frequency of AVHs, especially for those rated high in ‘attentional salience’”
From Auditory verbal hallucinations as atypical inner speech monitoring, and the potential of neurostimulation as a treatment option (2013) · cites this paper as Hoffman et al., 2013
The other two adequately powered studies (Hoffman et al., 2005, 2013) originate from the same institution.
“Of the three studies discussed here that have achieved adequate power, one finds no effect of neurostimulation (Slotema et al., 2011), and the other two originate from the same institution (Hoffman et al., 2005, 2013).”
From Auditory verbal hallucinations as atypical inner speech monitoring, and the potential of neurostimulation as a treatment option (2013) · cites this paper as Hoffman et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 82
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [35]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 1995 Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders – Patient Edition, Version 2.0 Biometrics Research Department, New York Psychiatric Institute
- Authors
- Hoffman, R. E., Wu, K., Pittman, B., Cahill, J. D., Hawkins, K. A., Fernandez, T., & Hannestad, J.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hoffman, Ralph E.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1008-1014
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3641174
- OpenAlex
- W2016865331
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH067073, R01MH073673, R25MH077823)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Keywords
- transcranial magnetic stimulation, auditory verbal hallucinations, Wernicke's area, schizophrenia, attentional salience, motor threshold, laterality
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hallucinations, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Temporal Lobe, Treatment Outcome, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review