Treating Working Memory Deficits in Schizophrenia: A Review of the Neurobiology
Abstract
Cognitive deficits are a core feature of schizophrenia. Among these deficits, working memory impairment is considered a central cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. The prefrontal cortex, a region critical for working memory performance, has been demonstrated as a critical liability region in schizophrenia. As yet, there are no standardized treatment options for working memory deficits in schizophrenia. In this review, we summarize the neuronal basis for working memory impairment in schizophrenia, including dysfunction in prefrontal signaling pathways (e.g., γ-aminobutyric acid transmission) and neural network synchrony (e.g., gamma/theta oscillations). We discuss therapeutic strategies for working memory dysfunction such as pharmacological agents, cognitive remediation therapy, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Despite the drawbacks of current approaches, the advances in neurobiological and translational treatment strategies suggest that clinical application of these methods will occur in the near future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The prefrontal cortex plays a key role in working memory in both healthy subjects and people with psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia.
“The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a key role in WM in both healthy subjects and people with psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia (see Kane & Engle, 2002 for review; Lett et al., 2014; Slifstein et al., 2015).”
From Systematic reviews of the acute effects of amphetamine on working memory and other cognitive performances in healthy individuals, with a focus on the potential influence of personality traits (2023) · cites this paper as Lett et al., 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 153 · Cited by 257
- Authors
- Lett, T. A., Voineskos, A. N., Kennedy, J. L., Levine, B., & Daskalakis, Z. J.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 361-370
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036597812
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 153
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, working memory deficits, prefrontal cortex, GABAergic neurotransmission, gamma oscillations, theta oscillations, cognitive remediation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, pharmacotherapy, cognitive impairment
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term, Neurobiology, Schizophrenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review