Genetic Risk for Schizophrenia: Convergence on Synaptic Pathways Involved in Plasticity
Abstract
Recent large-scale genomic studies have revealed two broad classes of risk alleles for schizophrenia: a polygenic component of risk mediated through multiple common risk variants and rarer more highly penetrant submicroscopic chromosomal deletions and duplications, known as copy number variants. The focus of this review is on the emerging findings from the latter and subsequent exome sequencing data of smaller, deleterious single nucleotide variants and indels. In these studies, schizophrenia patients were found to have enriched de novo mutations in genes belonging to the postsynaptic density at glutamatergic synapses, particularly components of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor signaling complex, including the PSD-95 complex, activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein interactors, the fragile X mental retardation protein complex, voltage-gated calcium channels, and genes implicated in actin cytoskeletal dynamics. The convergence of these implicated genes onto a coherent biological pathway at the synapse, with a specific role in plasticity, provides a significant advance in understanding pathogenesis and points to new targets for biological investigation. We consider the implications of these studies in the context of existing genetic data and the potential need to reassess diagnostic boundaries of neuropsychiatric disorders before discussing ways forward for more directed mechanistic studies to develop stratified, novel therapeutic approaches in the future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many of the genes whose pathological variation confers susceptibility to psychiatric disorders play fundamental roles in brain development.
“and indeed many of the genes whose pathological variation confers susceptibility to psychiatric disorders play fundamental roles in brain development 7-9 .”
From Developmental timing and critical windows for the treatment of psychiatric disorders (2016) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 290
- Authors
- Hall, J., Trent, S., Thomas, K. L., O’Donovan, M. C., & Owen, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Medical Research Council (GB)
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-58
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983719168
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 4.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council Centre (G0801418)
- Medical Research Council Programme (G0800509)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, genetic risk, copy number variation, de novo mutations, postsynaptic density, glutamatergic synapses, NMDA receptor signaling, PSD-95, FMRP, voltage-gated calcium channels, actin cytoskeleton, synaptic plasticity, single nucleotide variants, indels, polygenic risk, neuropsychiatric disorders
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Brain, Humans, Mutation, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Signal Transduction, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, DNA Copy Number Variations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review