Cited by 149Treatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Frontoparietal Activation During Response Inhibition Predicts Remission to Antidepressants in Patients With Major Depression

Gyurak, Anett, Patenaude, Brian, Korgaonkar, Mayuresh S., Grieve, Stuart M., Williams, Leanne M., Etkin, Amit·2016·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Despite cognitive function impairment in depression, its relationship to treatment outcome is not well understood. Here, we examined whether pretreatment activation of cortical circuitry during test of cognitive functions predicts outcomes for three commonly used antidepressants.Methods Eighty medication-free outpatients with major depression and 34 matched healthy controls were included as participants in the International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression (iSPOT-D) trial. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants completed three tasks that assessed core domains of cognitive functions: response inhibition (Go/NoGo), selective attention (oddball), and selective working memory updating (1-back). Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 arms: escitalopram, sertraline (serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors [SSRI]), or venlafaxine-extended release (serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor [SNRI]) therapy. Functional magnetic resonance imaging scans were repeated after 8 weeks of treatment, and remission was assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.Results Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation during inhibitory "no go" responses was a general predictor of remission, with remitters having the same pretreatment activation as control participants and nonremitters hypoactivating relative to controls. Posttreatment dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation was reduced in both remitters and controls but not in nonremitters. By contrast, inferior parietal activation differentially predicted remission between SSRI and SNRI medications, with SSRI remitters showing greater pretreatment activation than SSRI nonremitters and the SNRI group showing the opposite pattern.Conclusions Intact activation in the frontoparietal network during response inhibition, a core cognitive function, predicts remission with antidepressant treatment, particularly for SSRIs, and may be a potential substrate of the clinical effect of treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.037

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies comparing oddball task performance often find that unmedicated major depressive disorder patients respond more slowly than healthy controls.

    “Studies comparing oddball task performance by unmedicated MDD patients versus healthy controls often find that MDD patients respond more slowly than controls23–25, suggesting that even in the absence of overt distraction attentional focus is impaired.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Many studies show no change in sustained attention with SSRI treatment.

    “Many studies, albeit largely observational or with a mix of medications used, show no change in sustained attention25,99, selective attention100, or divided attention5,101, despite improvements in mood symptoms.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

  • SSRIs, currently the first-line class of pharmacologic treatment for depression, have generally not been shown to improve attention.

    “Unfortunately, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), currently the first-line class of pharmacologic treatment for depression, have generally not been shown to improve attention.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 149

Authors
Gyurak, A., Patenaude, B., Korgaonkar, M. S., Grieve, S. M., Williams, L. M., & Etkin, A.
Affiliations
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Etkin, Amit
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
274-281
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053952463
Cited by
149
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, antidepressant response prediction, response inhibition, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal cortex, frontoparietal network, cognitive function, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, escitalopram, sertraline, venlafaxine, treatment outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Australia, Cognition, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Remission Induction, Citalopram, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Sertraline, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review