Cited by 34Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlMusic Therapy and Health

The allure of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation as a novel therapeutic modality

Carreno, Flavia R., Frazer, Alan·2016·Biological Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.11.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 34

Authors
Carreno, F. R., & Frazer, A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Carreno, Flavia R.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
260-261
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2237008027
Cited by
34
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals International
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
Keywords
transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation, vagus nerve, vagus nerve stimulation, autonomic nervous system, neuromodulation
MeSH terms
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Humans, Vagus Nerve, Vagus Nerve Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review