Cited by 105Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Complementary neural circuits for divergent effects of oxytocin: social approach versus social anxiety

Open access
Steinman, Michael Q., Duque-Wilckens, Natalia, Trainor, Brian C.·2019·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Oxytocin (OT) is widely known for promoting social interactions, but there is growing appreciation that it can sometimes induce avoidance of social contexts. The social salience hypothesis posed an innovative solution to these apparently opposing actions by proposing that OT enhances the salience of both positive and negative social interactions. The mesolimbic dopamine system was put forth as a likely system to evaluate social salience owing to its well-described role in motivation. Evidence from several sources supports the premise that OT acting within the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area facilitates social reward and approach behavior. However, in aversive social contexts, additional pathways play critical roles in mediating the effects of OT. Recent data indicate that OT acts in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis to induce avoidance of potentially dangerous social contexts. Here, we review evidence for neural circuits mediating the effects of OT in appetitive and aversive social contexts. Specifically, we propose that distinct but potentially overlapping circuits mediate OT-dependent social approach or social avoidance. We conclude that a broader and more inclusive consideration of neural circuits of social approach and avoidance is needed as the field continues to evaluate the potential of OT-based therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.10.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The role of OXT is to enhance sensitivity to environmental changes for appropriate behavioral selection.

    “These findings suggest that the role of OXT is to enhance sensitivity to environmental changes for appropriate behavioral selection (Steinman et al., 2019).”

    From Music's context-dependent influence on oxytocin, social bonding, and emotion regulation: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Steinman et al., 2019

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes oxytocin as enhancing the salience of positive and aversive social contexts, helping account for both social approach and avoidance. The claim extends this to environmental changes generally and characterizes the resulting behavioral selection as appropriate; the passages support the narrower point about social contexts. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The bidirectional modulation of OXT suggests that therapeutic strategies need to move beyond merely increasing OXT levels, as OXT enhances the salience of both positive and negative social cues, encouraging social approach in safe contexts but inducing avoidance in aversive environments.

    “The bidirectional modulation of OXT suggests that therapeutic strategies need to move beyond merely increasing OXT levels, as OXT enhances the salience of both positive and negative social cues, encouraging social approach in safe contexts but inducing avoidance in aversive environments (Steinman et al., 2019).”
  • The social salience hypothesis suggests that OT acts to regulate the salience of external social cues, rather than strictly promoting affiliative behaviors.

    “These findings gave rise to the social salience hypothesis, which suggests that OT acts to regulate the salience of external social cues, rather than strictly promoting affiliative behaviors”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 148 · Cited by 105

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Taylor JH, Lebowitz ER, Silverman WK (2018): Anxiety disorders In: Martin A, Bloch MH, Volkmar FR, editors. Lewis’s child Adolesc psychiatry a Compr Textb, 5th ed Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer, pp 509– 518.

Authors
Steinman, M. Q., Duque-Wilckens, N., & Trainor, B. C.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Trainor, Brian C.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
85
Issue
10
Pages
792-801
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898403091
Cited by
105
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 MH103322)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, social approach, social avoidance, social anxiety, mesolimbic dopamine system, nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, social reward, neural circuits
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Brain, Choice Behavior, Dopamine, Humans, Neural Pathways, Oxytocin, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review