Cited by 477Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Neurobiology of opioid addiction: Opponent process, hyperkatifeia, and negative reinforcement

Koob, George F.·2020·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Opioids are powerful drugs that usurp and overpower the reward function of endogenous opioids and engage dramatic tolerance and withdrawal via molecular and neurocircuitry neuroadaptations within the same reward system. However, they also engage the brain systems for stress and pain (somatic and emotional) while producing hyperalgesia and hyperkatifeia, which drive pronounced drug-seeking behavior via processes of negative reinforcement. Hyperkatifeia (derived from the Greek "katifeia" for dejection or negative emotional state) is defined as an increase in intensity of the constellation of negative emotional or motivational signs and symptoms of withdrawal from drugs of abuse. In animal models, repeated extended access to drugs or opioids results in negative emotion-like states, reflected by the elevation of reward thresholds, lower pain thresholds, anxiety-like behavior, and dysphoric-like responses. Such negative emotional states that drive negative reinforcement are hypothesized to derive from the within-system dysregulation of key neurochemical circuits that mediate incentive-salience and/or reward systems (dopamine, opioid peptides) in the ventral striatum and from the between-system recruitment of brain stress systems (corticotropin-releasing factor, dynorphin, norepinephrine, hypocretin, vasopressin, glucocorticoids, and neuroimmune factors) in the extended amygdala. Hyperkatifeia can extend into protracted abstinence and interact with learning processes in the form of conditioned withdrawal to facilitate relapse to compulsive-like drug seeking. Compelling evidence indicates that plasticity in the brain pain emotional systems is triggered by acute excessive drug intake and becomes sensitized during the development of compulsive drug taking with repeated withdrawal. It then persists into protracted abstinence and contributes to the development and persistence of compulsive opioid-seeking behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.05.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 106 · Cited by 477

Authors
Koob, G. F.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Koob, George F.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
44-53
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949184225
Cited by
477
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 9
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
opioid use disorder, negative reinforcement, opponent processes, opioid withdrawal, hyperalgesia, drug-seeking behavior, reward systems, incentive salience, ventral striatum, extended amygdala, stress system, relapse, compulsive drug seeking, protracted abstinence, neural adaptation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Motivation, Opioid-Related Disorders, Neurobiology, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review