Cited by 269Resilience and Mental HealthStress Responses and CortisolChild Abuse and Trauma

The Biology of Human Resilience: Opportunities for Enhancing Resilience Across the Life Span

Feder, Adriana, Fred-Torres, Sharely, Southwick, Steven M., Charney, Dennis S.·2019·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Recent scientific and technological advances have brought us closer to being able to apply a true biopsychosocial approach to the study of resilience in humans. Decades of research have identified a range of psychosocial protective factors in the face of stress and trauma. Progress in resilience research is now advancing our understanding of the biology underlying these protective factors at multiple phenotypic levels, including stress response systems, neural circuitry function, and immune responses, in interaction with genetic factors. It is becoming clear that resilience involves active and unique biological processes that buffer the organism against the impact of stress, not simply involve a reversal of pathological mechanisms. Here, we provide an overview of recent progress in the field, highlighting key psychosocial milestones and accompanying biological changes during development, and into adulthood and old age. Continued advances in our understanding of psychological, social, and biological determinants of resilience will contribute to the development of novel interventions and help optimize the type and timing of intervention for those most at risk, resulting in a possible new framework for enhancing resilience across the life span.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.07.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 159 · Cited by 269

Authors
Feder, A., Fred-Torres, S., Southwick, S. M., & Charney, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Feder, Adriana
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
86
Issue
6
Pages
443-453
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962731401
Cited by
269
References
159
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U01-OH10729, U01-OH011473)
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • NARSAD
  • Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz Laboratory
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
resilience, psychosocial protective factors, stress system, neural circuits, immune response, genetic factors, biopsychosocial model, aging, trauma, resilience interventions, lifespan development
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brain, Child, Humans, Longevity, Stress, Psychological, Epigenesis, Genetic, Resilience, Psychological, Gene-Environment Interaction, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review