Neuroimaging-based Individualized Prediction of Cognition and Behavior for Mental Disorders and Health: Methods and Promises
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The neuroimaging community has witnessed a paradigm shift in biomarker discovery from using traditional univariate brain mapping approaches to multivariate predictive models, allowing the field to move toward a translational neuroscience era. Regression-based multivariate models (hereafter "predictive modeling") provide a powerful and widely used approach to predict human behavior with neuroimaging features. These studies maintain a focus on decoding individual differences in a continuously behavioral phenotype from neuroimaging data, opening up an exciting opportunity to describe the human brain at the single-subject level. In this survey, we provide an overview of recent studies that utilize machine learning approaches to identify neuroimaging predictors over the past decade. We first review regression-based approaches and highlight connectome-based predictive modeling, which has grown in popularity in recent years. Next, we systematically describe recent representative studies using these tools in the context of cognitive function, symptom severity, personality traits, and emotion processing. Finally, we highlight a few challenges related to combining multimodal data, longitudinal prediction, external validations, and the employment of deep learning methods that have emerged from our review of the existing literature, as well as present some promising and challenging future directions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multimodal fusion can better capture neural mechanisms of brain disorders than a single imaging modality.
“Accumulating evidence suggests that the neural mechanisms of brain disorders are not fully characterized by a single imaging modality, but can be better captured via a multimodal approach [2].”
From Confound Controlled Multimodal Neuroimaging Data Fusion and Its Application to Developmental Disorders (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
The ‘Prediction using Multimodal data’ section (page not provided) says multimodal fusion can uncover information undetectable by any single modality and can improve understanding of brain systems involved in cognition. It does not specifically establish that fusion better captures the neural mechanisms of brain disorders, so the claim extends the paper’s point beyond the evidence presented. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 162 · Cited by 309
- Authors
- Sui, J., Jiang, R., Bustillo, J., & Calhoun, V.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Calhoun, Vince
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 818-828
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7483317
- OpenAlex
- W3008923041
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 162
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 14
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (acceptedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- neuroimaging biomarkers, connectome-based predictive modeling, personalized prediction, cognitive function prediction, symptom severity prediction, personality traits, emotional processing, multimodal neuroimaging, longitudinal prediction, external validation, deep learning, machine learning, mental illness
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Neuroimaging, Connectome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review