26. Neurocognitive Effects of Adjunctive D-Cycloserine and Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DeMayo et al. (2023) reported that subjective cognition improved after treatment.
“In their double-blind randomized placebocontrolled trial of combined D-Cycloserine and iTBS, DeMayo et al. (2023) reported that subjective cognition improved after treatment.”
From Neurocognitive effects of theta burst stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adults: A systematic review and recommendations for future research (2025) · cites this paper as DeMayo et al., 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1
- Authors
- DeMayo, M., Cole, J., Sohn, M., Bray, S., Harris, A., Patten, S. B., & McGirr, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- S79-S80
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4363674009
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, D-cycloserine, intermittent theta burst stimulation, NMDA receptor partial agonist, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cognitive function, neuroplasticity, adjunctive therapy, cognitive enhancement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
