35. Efficacy of Ketamine in Unmedicated Adults With OCD: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A randomized controlled trial of 15 participants found significant long-term reductions in OCD symptoms for up to three weeks after an acute ketamine infusion.
“Another randomized, controlled trial (n = 15) found significant long-term reductions in OCD symptoms for up to three weeks after an acute ketamine infusion [114]”
From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [114]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update
Johnston, J. N., Kadriu, B., Kraus, C., Henter, I. D., & Zarate, C. A. (2024) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-023-01632-1 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rodriguez, C., Chen, C.-M., Glover, G., Jo, B., Spielman, D., Williams, L., van Roessel, P., DeBattista, C., Wintermark, M., Lombardi, A., Pinto, A., Valentine, K., Filippou-Frye, M., Hawkins, J., McCarthy, E., Mukunda, P., Varias, A., Wilson, J., & Wright, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- S83
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4363651135
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- ketamine, obsessive-compulsive disorder, NMDA receptor antagonists, glutamate, treatment efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review