Emotion and motivated behavior: postural adjustments to affective picture viewing.
Abstract
Thirty-six participants (18 female, 18 male) viewed affective pictures to investigate the coupling between emotional reactions and motivated behavior. Framed within the biphasic theory of emotion, the three systems approach was employed by collecting measures of subjective report, expressive physiology, and motivated behavior. Postural adjustments associated with viewing affective pictures were measured. Results indicated sex-differences for postural responses to unpleasant pictures; an effect not found for pleasant and neutral picture contents. Females exhibited increased postural movement in the posterior direction, and males exhibited increased movement in the anterior direction, for unpleasant pictures. Subjective report of valence and arousal using the self-assessment manikin (SAM), and the startle eye-blink reflex were collected during a separate session, which replicated previous picture-viewing research. Specifically, participants rated pleasant pictures higher in valence and exhibited smaller startle responses compared to unpleasant pictures. Females also reported lower valence ratings compared to males across all picture contents. These findings extend our knowledge of motivated engagement with affective stimuli and indicate that postural responses may provide insight into sex-related differences in withdrawal behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because the insula is involved in neural representations of body state-including acute sympathetic arousal-increased activity there reflects the individual's hyperaroused body state.
“And because the insula is involved in neural representations of body state—including acute sympathetic arousal—increased activity there reflects the individual’s hyperaroused body state.54,57,59”
From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [54]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 187
- Authors
- Hillman, C. H., Rosengren, K. S., & Smith, D. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hillman, Charles H
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-62
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130684172
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Campus Research Board
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- postural adjustments, sex differences, unpleasant pictures, withdrawal behavior, valence and arousal, Self-Assessment Manikin
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Arousal, Blinking, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Motivation, Posture, Sex Factors, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review