The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Depression and reduced sensitivity to non-rewards versus rewards: Evidence from event-related potentials
Abstract
Depression has been characterized in recent years in terms of deficits in positive affect and an underactive approach-related motivational system. Consistent with this view, behavioral and electrocortical studies suggest that reduced sensitivity to rewards may be a fundamental feature of depression. Within the event-related potential literature, the feedback negativity (FN) has been identified as a component that is sensitive to feedback indicating non-rewards versus rewards, and has been linked to phasic changes in midbrain dopamine levels that indicate whether events are better or worse than expected; thus, the FN may be a useful marker for abnormalities in reward sensitivity associated with depression. In the current study, a simple gambling task was used to elicit an FN in participants, and the magnitude of the FN was related to levels of depressive symptoms, as well as levels of anxiety and stress. The enhancement of the FN to non-rewards relative to rewards was found to be inversely related to depression and stress reactivity; only the relationship between the FN and stress remained significant after controlling for the other psychological variables. The P3 to feedback, meanwhile, was inversely related to depression and anxiety scores regardless of feedback type. These results are discussed within the context of current models of depression and reward sensitivity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adults with current and remitted depression (e.g., Foti and Hajcak, 2009), high risk older adolescents (Foti et al., 2011), and younger youth (ages 8-13) with depressive symptoms (Bress et al., 2012), have exhibited reduced FN amplitude in response to monetary rewards and performance feedback”
From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as Foti and Hajcak, 2009
In the citing paper
“Depressed individuals view rewards, like money or social encouragement, as less motivating than individuals without depressive symptoms [16-18].”
From Examining the effectiveness of gamification in mental health apps for depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“Depression generally has been associated with hyposensitivity to rewards, particularly among those with anhedonic symptoms [11-13,16,17].”
From Examining the effectiveness of gamification in mental health apps for depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u · Cited by 14,523
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors
Cattell, R. B. (1966) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 · Cited by 13,554
(1995) · Cited by 6,909
(2005) · Cited by 5,977
Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466505x29657 · Cited by 5,801
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · Cited by 5,055 · cited 1×
“The EEG for each trial was corrected for blinks and eye movements using the method developed by Gratton et al .”
Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176 · Cited by 4,874
Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1991) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.100.3.316 · Cited by 4,601
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.679 · Cited by 4,027
Hammen, C. (2005) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938 · Cited by 2,979
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The reward positivity: From basic research on reward to a biomarker for depression
Proudfit, G. H. (2015) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12370 · Cited by 910
Self-citationHeart rate variability as a transdiagnostic biomarker of psychopathology
Beauchaine, T. P., & Thayer, J. F. (2015) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.08.004 · Cited by 870
Treadway, M. T., Buckholtz, J. W., Schwartzman, A. N., Lambert, W. E., & Zald, D. H. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006598 · Cited by 769
Walsh, M. M., & Anderson, J. R. (2012) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.05.008 · Cited by 577
Dien, J. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.12.009 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Foti, D., & Hajcak, G.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hajcak, Greg
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150096845
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- depression, reward sensitivity, feedback negativity, P3, event-related potentials, stress reactivity, anxiety, gambling task, dopamine, approach motivation, positive affect
- MeSH terms
- Brain Mapping, Cues, Depression, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychophysics, Reward, Time Factors, Principal Component Analysis, Feedback, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
