Cited by 454Sleep and Work-Related FatigueNeural dynamics and brain functionEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Frontal theta activity reflects distinct aspects of mental fatigue

Wascher, Edmund, Rasch, Björn, Sänger, Jessica, Hoffmann, Sven, Schneider, Daniel, Rinkenauer, Gerhard, Heuer, Herbert, Gutberlet, Ingmar·2014·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Longer lasting performance in cognitively demanding tasks leads to an exhaustion of cognitive resources and to a state commonly described as mental fatigue. More specifically, the allocation and focusing of attention become less efficient with time on task. Additionally, the selection of even simple responses becomes more error prone. With respect to the recorded EEG, mental fatigue has been reported to be associated with an increase in frontal theta and frontal and occipital alpha activity. The present study focused on the time course of changes in behavior and in the EEG to characterize fatigue-related processes. Participants performed a spatial stimulus-response-compatibility task in eight blocks for an overall duration of 4h. Error rates increased continuously with time on task. Total alpha power was larger at the end compared to the beginning of the experiment. However, alpha power increased rapidly and reached its maximal amplitude already after 1h, whereas frontal theta showed a continuous increase with time on task, possibly related to increased effort to keep the performance level high. Time frequency analyses revealed power changes in the theta band induced by task relevant information that might be assigned to a drain of executive control capacities. Thus, frontal theta turned out to be a reliable marker of distinct changes in cognitive processing with increasing fatigue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.010

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wascher, E., Rasch, B., Sänger, J., Hoffmann, S., Schneider, D., Rinkenauer, G., Heuer, H., & Gutberlet, I.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (DE)
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Wascher, Edmund
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
96
Pages
57-65
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075149264
Cited by
454
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
mental fatigue, frontal theta activity, EEG, alpha power, time on task, stimulus-response compatibility, error rate, executive function, cognitive effort, sustained attention, time-frequency analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Alpha Rhythm, Analysis of Variance, Electroencephalography, Mental Fatigue, Female, Fourier Analysis, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Theta Rhythm, Time Factors, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review