The temporal dynamics of emotional acceptance: Experience, expression, and physiology
Abstract
Emotional acceptance has begun to attract considerable attention from researchers and clinicians alike. It is not yet clear, however, what effects emotional acceptance has on early emotion response dynamics. To address this question, participants (N = 37) were shown emotional pictures and cued either to simply attend to them, or to accept or suppress their emotional responses. Continuous measures of emotion experience, expressive behavior, and autonomic responses were obtained. Results indicated that, compared to no regulation, acceptance led to more positive emotions, transiently enhanced expressivity, and lowered respiratory rate. Compared to suppression, acceptance led to more positive emotions, stronger expressivity, and smaller changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and pulse amplitude, as well as greater oxygenation. Acceptance and suppression thus have opposite effects on emotional response dynamics. Because acceptance enhances positive emotion experience and expression, this strategy may be particularly useful in facilitating social interactions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emotional acceptance is effective in reducing negative emotions such as sadness and increasing positive affect in short-term experiments.
“Several studies on emotion regulation [10] have shown that a strategy of emotional acceptance is effective in reducing negative emotions such as sadness [11–14] and increasing positive affect [15] in short-term experiments.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 104 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Dan-Glauser, E. S., & Gross, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- ORCID
- Gross, James J.
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 108
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031452841
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- emotional acceptance, emotion regulation, emotional suppression, emotional expressivity, autonomic responses, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygenation, positive emotions, emotional pictures, temporal dynamics of emotion
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Autonomic Nervous System, Blood Pressure, Cues, Electrocardiography, Emotions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Respiratory Mechanics, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review