The link between interoceptive processing and anxiety in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder: extending adult findings into a developmental sample
Open accessAbstract
Anxiety is a major associated feature of autism spectrum disorders. The incidence of anxiety symptoms in this population has been associated with altered interoceptive processing. Here, we investigated whether recent findings of impaired interoceptive accuracy (quantified using heartbeat detection tasks) and exaggerated interoceptive sensibility (subjective sensitivity to internal sensations on self-report questionnaires) in autistic adults, can be extended into a school-age sample of children and adolescents (n = 75). Half the sample had a verified diagnosis of an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and half were IQ- and age-matched children and adolescents without ASD. The discrepancy between an individual's score on these two facets of interoception (interoceptive accuracy and interoceptive sensibility), conceptualized as an interoceptive trait prediction error, was previously found to predict anxiety symptoms in autistic adults. We replicated the finding of reduced interoceptive accuracy in autistic participants, but did not find exaggerated interoceptive sensibility relative to non-autistic participants. Nonetheless, the positive association between anxiety and interoceptive trait prediction error was replicated. However, in this sample, the best predictor of anxiety symptoms was interoceptive sensibility. Finally, we observed lower metacognitive accuracy for interoception in autistic children and adolescents, relative to their non-autistic counterparts. Despite their reduced interoceptive accuracy on the heartbeat tracking task and comparable accuracy on the heartbeat discrimination task, the autistic group reported higher confidence than the typical group in the discrimination task. Findings are consistent with theories of ASD as a disorder of interoceptive processing, but highlight the importance of validating cognitive models of developmental conditions within developmental populations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anxiety is characterised by high levels of attention to internal signals, as measured by the BPQ, relative to one's cardiac interoceptive accuracy.
“Consistent with this conjecture, there is evidence to suggest that anxiety is characterised by high levels of attention to internal signals (as measured by the BPQ) relative to one’s cardiac interoceptive accuracy (Garfinkel et al., 2016b; Palser et al., 2018).”
From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Palser et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 104
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., Risi, S., Gotham, K., Bishop, S. L., ... Guthrie, W. (2012). ADOS-2: Autism diagnostic observation schedule (2nd ed.). Hogrefe.
- Wechsler, D. (2011). Psychological corporationWASI-II: Wechsler abbreviated scale of in- telligence (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
- Authors
- Palser, E. R., Fotopoulou, A., Pellicano, E., & Kilner, J. M.
- Affiliations
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Palser, E.R.
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 136
- Pages
- 13-21
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799798705
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biological Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
- Medical Research Council (MRC) (MR/J013145/1)
- Leverhulme Trust
- European Research Council Starting Investigator Award (ERC-2012-STG GA313755)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, interoception, anxiety, interoceptive accuracy, interoceptive sensibility, metacognitive accuracy, heartbeat detection, children and adolescents
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Aging, Anxiety, Awareness, Child, Cognition, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Interoception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review