Cited by 6Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFace Recognition and PerceptionAction Observation and Synchronization

My body, your emotions: Viscerosomatic modulation of facial expression discrimination

Chick, Christina F., Rounds, James D., Hill, Alizé B., Anderson, Adam K.·2020·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Interoception reflects the ability to observe one's innermost bodily states. Here, we assessed whether interoceptive accuracy (IA) is related to the empathic ability to discriminate others' emotions. Participants (N = 111) completed a heartbeat tracking task, as well as an emotional go/no-go task with fearful and disgusted faces. Empathic facial mimicry during the go/no-go task was measured using electromyography (EMG) of the Corrugator Supercilii muscle. Higher IA was associated with higher perceptual sensitivity for emotional faces but was unrelated to response bias. Individuals higher in IA had stronger coupling between facial EMG and task performance. IA and facial EMG were associated with Go but not with NoGo trials, consistent with a specific modulation of perceptual sensitivity. These results suggest that tuning into one's own viscerosomatic signals relates to empathic mimicry and perception of others' emotional states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107779

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chick, C. F., Rounds, J. D., Hill, A. B., & Anderson, A. K.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Chick, Christina F.
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
149
Pages
107779
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981186068
Cited by
6
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
interoceptive accuracy, interoception, facial expression discrimination, emotion perception, empathy, facial mimicry, emotional go/no-go task, corrugator supercilii, facial electromyography, fearful faces, perceptual sensitivity
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Electromyography, Emotions, Empathy, Facial Muscles, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult, Interoception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review