Cited by 95Dyeing and Modifying Textile FibersBiological Stains and PhytochemicalsCultural Heritage Materials Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Isolation of colour components from native dye-bearing plants in northeastern India

BHUYAN, R·2005·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Recently dyes derived from natural sources have emerged as important alternatives to synthetic dyes. A study was initiated in the year 2000 at the RRL (CSIR), Jorhat to extract dyes from parts of five different plant species indigenous to northeastern India. The colour components responsible for dyeing were isolated and their chemical constituents were established based on chemical and spectroscopic investigations. The principal colour components from the species Morinda angustifolia Roxb., Rubia cordifolia Linn. and Tectona grandis Linn. were found to contain mainly anthraquinone moieties in their molecules. Those from the species Mimusops elengi Linn. and Terminalia arjuna (Roxb.) Wight & Arn. contained flavonoid moieties in their molecules. The absorption of dye (%) on fibres increased with increasing concentrations of dye in the dye-bath. Maximum absorption of dyes on fibres was obtained at 3% concentration of dyes obtained from R. cordfolia (35.350%), M. angustifolia (31.580%) and T. grandis (25.888%) and at 4% concentration of the dyes from M. elengi (31.917%) and T. arjuna (12.246%). The K/S values were found to increase with the increase in concentration of mordants. The colour co-ordinates of dyed samples were found to lie in the yellow-red quadrant of the colour space diagram. The dyes obtained from the native plants may be alternative sources to synthetic dyes for the dyeing of natural silk and cotton.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 95

Metadata

Authors
BHUYAN, R.
Affiliations
North East Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
BHUYAN, R
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
363-372
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049902586
Cited by
95
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Biological Stains and Phytochemicals
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Keywords
natural dyes, anthraquinone dyes, Rubia cordifolia, Tectona grandis, Mimusops elengi, Terminalia arjuna, mordant dyeing, K/S value, colour coordinates, cotton dyeing, Northeast India
MeSH terms
Anthraquinones, Azo Compounds, Colorimetry, India, Naphthoquinones, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Pigmentation, Pigments, Biological, Plant Extracts, Plants, Quercetin, Spectrophotometry, Infrared, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Textiles, Cotton Fiber, Silk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review