Cited by 84Bioenergy crop production and managementPasture and Agricultural SystemsAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

Management of warm-season grass mixtures for biomass production in South Dakota USA

Mulkey, V.R., Owens, V.N., Lee, D.K.·2008·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), and indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash) are native warm-season grasses commonly used for pasture, hay, and conservation. More recently switchgrass has also been identified as a potential biomass energy crop, but management of mixtures of these species for biomass is not well documented. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to: (1) determine the effects of harvest timing and N rate on yield and biomass characteristics of established warm-season grass stands containing a mixture of switchgrass, big bluestem, and indiangrass, and (2) evaluate the impact of harvest management on species composition. Five N rates (0, 56, 112, and 224 kg ha(-1) applied annually in spring and 224 kg ha(-1) evenly split between spring and fall) and two harvest timings (anthesis and killing frost) were applied to plots at two South Dakota USA locations from 2001 to 2003. Harvesting once a year shortly after a killing frost produced the greatest yields with high concentrations of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) along with lower concentrations of total nitrogen (TN) and ash. This harvest timing also allowed for the greatest percentage of desirable species while maintaining low grass weed percentages. While N rates of 56 and 112 kg ha(-1) tended to increase total biomass without promoting severe invasion of grass and broadleaf weed species, N application did not always result in significant increases in biomass production. Based on these results, mixtures of switchgrass and big bluestem were well suited for sustainable biomass energy production. Furthermore, N requirements of these mixtures were relatively low thus reducing production input costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.12.035

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Switchgrass can be successfully grown for biomass.

    “A number of trials have demonstrated that switchgrass can be successfully grown for biomass (Lemus et al., 2002; Mulkey et al., 2008; Mulkey et al., 2006; Parrish et al., 2008; Schmer et al., 2006; Tober et al., 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulkey, V. R., Owens, V. N., & Lee, D. K.
Affiliations
South Dakota State University (US)
Corresponding author
Owens, V.N.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
609-617
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997512141
Cited by
84
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
switchgrass, big bluestem, indiangrass, energy crops, harvest time, nitrogen fertilization, forage yield, species composition, weed invasion, native grasses, South Dakota
MeSH terms
Detergents, Poaceae, Lignin, Nitrogen, Rain, Seasons, South Dakota, Species Specificity, Time Factors, United States, Biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review