Response surface methodology to supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis
Abstract
Experimental design was used to investigate the effect of operating temperature (40-80 degrees C), operating pressure (30-50 MPa), and extraction time (1-4h) of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) extraction on astaxanthin yields and the extract antioxidant activity (IC50). The ranges of the factors investigated were 40-80 degrees C for the operating temperature (X1), 30-50 MPa for the operating pressure (X2), and 1-4h for the extraction time (X3). The statistical analysis of the experiment indicated that pressure, extraction time, and the interaction between temperature and pressure (X1X2) had significant effect on astaxanthin yields. The central composite design showed that polynomial regression models were in good agreement with the experimental results with the coefficients of determination of 0.924 and 0.846 for astaxanthin yield and antioxidant activity, respectively. The optimal condition for astaxanthin yield within the experimental range of the variables studied was at 70 degrees C, 50 MPa, and 4h. At this condition, the predicted amount of astaxanthin extracted was 23.04 mg/g (2.3 wt% or 83.78% recovery). For the effect of experimental extraction conditions on antioxidant activity, IC50 was used as an index, which is the concentration that gives a 50% reduction in the absorbance of the ABTS free radical. The analysis of the results showed that the interaction between the operating temperature and operating pressure (X1X2) was the only significant factor affecting the extract antioxidant activity. The statistical model gave the minimum point for antioxidant activity at 67 degrees C, 40.3 MPa, and 1.86 h of extraction, at which the value for 1/IC50 was 0.39 l/mg (or IC50 was 2.57 mg/l).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The optimal pressure level determined in this study is similar to that applied for supercritical CO2-based extraction of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis.
“Note that the optimal pressure level determined in this study is similar to that applied for supercritical CO2-based extraction of astaxanthin from the green microalga Haematococcus pluvialis [48].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 164
- Authors
- Thana, P., Machmudah, S., Goto, M., Sasaki, M., Pavasant, P., & Shotipruk, A.
- Affiliations
- Chulalongkorn University (TH)
- Kumamoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Shotipruk, Artiwan
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3110-3115
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992707046
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chulalongkorn University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
- Keywords
- astaxanthin, Haematococcus pluvialis, supercritical CO2 extraction, extraction optimization, antioxidant activity, extraction temperature, extraction pressure, extraction time, carotenoid yield, ABTS radical scavenging
- MeSH terms
- Chlorophyta, Carbon Dioxide, Gases, Kinetics, Pressure, Surface Properties, Thermodynamics, Xanthophylls
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review